The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg
; 41(2): 359-366, 2024 Apr.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38388132
ABSTRACT
The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares
/
Políticas Editoriais
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Clin Podiatr Med Surg
Assunto da revista:
PODIATRIA
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article