Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antibiotic prophylaxis with urodynamic studies in spinal cord injury: Assessing practice patterns and outcomes to guide future practice in a single center.
Pham, Du; Chi, Bradley; Skelton, Felicia; Huang, Donna.
Afiliação
  • Pham D; H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Chi B; H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Skelton F; H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Huang D; Spinal Cord Injury Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J Spinal Cord Med ; : 1-6, 2024 Feb 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391262
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT/

OBJECTIVE:

Despite urinary tract infections (UTIs) being a common problem in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), and a well-known complication of invasive urologic procedures, little consensus exists regarding the standard of care for peri-procedural antibiotic use for SCI patients undergoing urodynamics studies (UDS). Our research seeks to evaluate local antibiotic prophylaxis pattern in SCI patients undergoing UDS, assess incidence of post-procedural UTI, describe local antibiotic resistance trends, and provide antibiotic stewardship considerations to guide future practice. DESIGN/SETTING/

PARTICIPANTS:

Retrospective cohort study of SCI patients undergoing UDS from January 2010 to January 2020 at a Veterans Affairs SCI Center. Data on patient demographics, UTI risk factors, pre-procedural urinalysis and culture, and peri-procedural antibiotics was extracted. Incidence of post-procedural UTI was tabulated. Findings were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS:

331 patients were studied. Pre-procedural urine culture was done in 73% of cases, with positive results in 49%. E. coli was the most commonly isolated organism (19%). Antibiotics were used in 86% of cases, 26% of which had a negative culture. A onetime dose of intramuscular gentamicin given immediately pre-procedure was the most common practice (53%; N = 152). No cases of post-procedural UTIs were identified during the study period.

CONCLUSION:

No post-UDS UTIs occurred under current local practice where most patients received a one-time dose of intramuscular gentamicin as prophylaxis. Though routine gentamicin prophylaxis may play a role in reducing UTI incidence, the low rate of post-UDS UTI in this population, including patients with positive cultures who received no antibiotics, suggests the possibility of refining practice patterns to improve antibiotic stewardship.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Spinal Cord Med Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Spinal Cord Med Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos