Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Severe Lung Dysfunction and Pulmonary Blood Flow during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Falk, Lars; Lidegran, Marika; Diaz Ruiz, Sandra; Hultman, Jan; Broman, Lars Mikael.
Afiliação
  • Falk L; ECMO Centre Karolinska, ME Pediatric Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Akademiska Straket 14, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lidegran M; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Diaz Ruiz S; Department of Pediatric Radiology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hultman J; Department of Pediatric Radiology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Broman LM; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Clin Med ; 13(4)2024 Feb 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398425
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is indicated for patients with severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure. The standard technique to visualize the extent of pulmonary damage during ECMO is computed tomography (CT).

PURPOSE:

This single-center, retrospective study investigated whether pulmonary blood flow (PBF) measured with echocardiography can assist in assessing the extent of pulmonary damage and whether echocardiography and CT findings are associated with patient outcomes.

METHODS:

All patients (>15 years) commenced on ECMO between 2011 and 2017 with septic shock of pulmonary origin and a treatment time >28 days were screened. Of 277 eligible patients, 9 were identified where both CT and echocardiography had been consecutively performed.

RESULTS:

CT failed to indicate any differences in viable lung parenchyma within or between survivors and non-survivors at any time during ECMO treatment. Upon initiation of ECMO, the survivors (n = 5) and non-survivors (n = 4) had similar PBF. During a full course of ECMO support, survivors showed no change in PBF (3.8 ± 2.1 at ECMO start vs. 7.9 ± 4.3 L/min, p = 0.12), whereas non-survivors significantly deteriorated in PBF from 3.5 ± 1.0 to 1.0 ± 1.1 L/min (p = 0.029). Tidal volumes were significantly lower over time among the non-survivors, p = 0.047.

CONCLUSIONS:

In prolonged ECMO for pulmonary septic shock, CT was not found to be effective for the evaluation of pulmonary viability or recovery. This hypothesis-generating investigation supports echocardiography as a tool to predict pulmonary recovery via the assessment of PBF at the early to later stages of ECMO support.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia