An Investigation Into the Effect of Different Static Magnetic Fields of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI on the Measurement of Tumor Diameters in Breast Cancer.

ABSTRACT

Objective This study aimed to determine whether differences in the static field strength of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI systems affect the diagnostic results of tumor size measurement in breast cancer and to compare them with the results of tumor size in surgical pathology diagnosis. Methods We adopted a retrospective and case-control study design. We included patients with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent breast MRI at our hospital between January 2017 and March 2023. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (Gd-T1WI) MRI, and tumor size from surgical pathology were compared via a significance difference test and correlation analysis between the two groups. In this study, the maximum diameters of the tumor obtained by DWI and Gd-T1WI on 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI systems were divided by the maximum diameter from surgical pathology diagnosis to arrive at the tumor ratio index. Results A total of 36 patients met the selection criteria 15 for the 1.5-T system and 21 for the 3.0-T system; all of them were female. The mean ratio of pathological tumor length to diameter measured by MRI for each system showed no significant difference between the groups (p=0.653). For the 1.5-T MRI system, the ratio of tumor length diameter by DWI to that by pathology was 1.042 ±0.361, and the ratio of tumor length diameter by Gd-T1WI to that by pathology was 1.107 ±0.314, with no significant difference observed between ratios (p=0.345). The correlation coefficient between them was r=0.730 (p=0.002). For the 3.0-T MRI system, the ratio of tumor length diameter by DWI to that by pathology was 0.893 ±0.197, while the ratio of tumor length diameter by Gd-T1WI to that by pathology was 1.062 ±0.177, with a significant difference between the two (p<0.001). The correlation coefficient between the two groups was 0.695 (p<0.001). Conclusions While there was no significant difference in the ratios of tumor length diameter measured by 1.5-T Gd-T1WI and DWI compared to pathology, there was a significant difference in the ratios of tumor length diameter measured by 3.0-T DWI and Gd-T1WI compared to pathology. Hence, only 3.0-T DWI can lead to a potential underestimation of tumor length.