Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring evidence-based clinical guideline compliance in the paediatric intensive care unit.
Hay, Rebecca E; Martin, Dori-Ann; Rutas, Gary J; Jamal, Shelina M; Parsons, Simon J.
Afiliação
  • Hay RE; Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada rebecca.elise.hay@gmail.com.
  • Martin DA; Pediatric Critical Care, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rutas GJ; Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Jamal SM; Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Parsons SJ; Pediatric Critical Care, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(1)2024 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429064
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence-based clinical care guidelines improve medical treatment by reducing error, improving outcomes and possibly lowering healthcare costs. While some data exist on individual guideline compliance, no data exist on overall compliance to multiple nuanced guidelines in a paediatric intensive care setting.

METHODS:

Guideline compliance was observed and measured with a prospective cohort at a tertiary academic paediatric medical-surgical intensive care unit. Adherence to 19 evidence-based clinical care guidelines was evaluated in 814 patients, and reasons for non-compliance were noted along with other associated outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Overall facility compliance was unexpectedly high at 77.8% over 4512 compliance events, involving 826 admissions. Compliance varied widely between guidelines. Guidelines with the highest compliance were stress ulcer prophylaxis (97.1%) and transfusion administration such as fresh frozen plasma (97.4%) and platelets (94.8%); guidelines with the lowest compliance were ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention (28.7%) and vitamin K administration (34.8%). There was no significant change in compliance over time with observation. Guidelines with binary decision branch points or single-page decision flow diagrams had a higher average compliance of 90.6%. Poor compliance was more often observed with poor perception of guideline trustworthiness and time limitations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Measuring guideline compliance, though onerous, allowed for evaluation of current clinical practices and identified actionable areas for institutional improvement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Instalações de Saúde Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Custos de Cuidados de Saúde / Instalações de Saúde Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá