Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Claims-Based Method for Identification and Characterization of Practicing Interventional Radiologists.
Waid, Mikki D; Rula, Elizabeth Y; Hawkins, C Matthew; Findeiss, Laura; Liu, Raymond.
Afiliação
  • Waid MD; Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. Electronic address: mwaid@neimanhpi.org.
  • Rula EY; Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia.
  • Hawkins CM; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Findeiss L; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Liu R; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 35(6): 909-917.e5, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447767
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To propose a research method for identifying "practicing interventional radiologists" using 2 national claims data sets. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The 2015-2019 100% Medicare Part B data and 2015-2019 private insurance claims from Optum's Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database were used to rank-order radiologists' interventional radiology (IR)-related work as a percentage of total billed work relative value units (RVUs). Characteristics were analyzed at various threshold percentages. External validation used Medicare self-designated specialty with Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) membership records; Youden index evaluated sensitivity and specificity. Multivariate logistic regression assessed practicing IR characteristics.

RESULTS:

In the Medicare data, above a 10% IR-related work threshold, only 23.8% of selected practicing interventional radiologists were designated as interventional radiologists; above 50% and 90% thresholds, this percentage increased to 42.0% and 47.5%, respectively. The mean percentage of IR-related work among practicing interventional radiologists was 45%, 84%, and 96% of total work RVUs for the 10%, 50%, and 90% thresholds, respectively. At these thresholds, the CDM practicing interventional radiologists included 21.2%, 35.2%, and 38.4% designated interventional radiologists, and evaluation and management services comprised relatively more total work RVUs. Practicing interventional radiologists were more likely to be males, metropolitan, and earlier in their careers than other radiologists at all thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most radiologists performing IR-related work are designated in claims data as diagnostic radiologists, indicating insufficiency of specialty designation for IR identification. The proposed method to identify practicing interventional radiologists by percent IR-related work effort could improve generalizability and comparability across claims-based IR studies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia Intervencionista / Bases de Dados Factuais / Radiologistas Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiologia Intervencionista / Bases de Dados Factuais / Radiologistas Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article