Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peroneal artery injury potential due to different syndesmosis screw placement options: a simulation study with lower extremity computed tomography angiography.
Aytekin, Kürsad; Çakir, Ismet Miraç; Tasdemir, Merve Nur; Balta, Orhan.
Afiliação
  • Aytekin K; School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Department of Anatomy, University of Giresun, Giresun, Turkey. kursadaytekin@gmail.com.
  • Çakir IM; School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Giresun, Giresun, Turkey.
  • Tasdemir MN; School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Giresun, Giresun, Turkey.
  • Balta O; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gaziosmanpasa University Hospital, Kaleardi District Muhittin Fisunoglu Street, 60100, Tokat, Turkey.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(5): 2119-2125, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492060
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of this study is to assess the risk of peroneal artery injury of hardware placement at the fixation of syndesmotic injuries. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The lower extremity computed tomography angiography was used to design the study. The syndesmosis screw placement range was simulated every 0.5 cm, from 0.5 to 5 cm proximal to the ankle joint. The screw axes were drawn as 20°, 30° or individual angle according to the femoral epicondylar axis. The proximity between the screw axis and the peroneal artery was measured in millimeters. Potential peroneal artery injury was noted if the distance between the peroneal artery to the axis of the simulated screw was within the outer shaft radius of the simulated screw. The Pearson chi-square test was used and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS:

The potential for injury to the peroneal artery increased as the syndesmosis screw level rose proximally from the ankle joint level or as the diameter of the syndesmosis screw increasds. In terms of syndesmosis screw trajection, the lowest risk of injury was observed with the syndesmosis screw angle of 20°. Simulations with a screw diameter of 3.5 mm exhibited the least potential for peroneal artery injury.

CONCLUSION:

Thanks to this radiological anatomy simulation study, we believe that we have increased the awareness of the peroneal artery potential in syndesmosis screw application. Each syndesmosis screw placement option may have different potential for injury to the peroneal artery. To decrease the peroneal artery injury potential, we recommend the followings. If individual syndesmosis screw angle trajection can be measured, place the screw 1.5 cm proximal to the ankle joint using a 3.5 mm screw shaft. If not, fix it with 30° trajection regardless of the screw diameter at the same level. If the most important issue is the peroneal artery circulation, use the screw level up to 1 cm proximal to the ankle joint regardless of the screw angle trajection and screw diameter.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parafusos Ósseos / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Parafusos Ósseos / Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia