Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vocal Effort and Acoustic Analysis of Gargle Phonation Versus Water Swallow in Patients With Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A Clinical Trial.
Orbelo, Diana M; Charney, Sara A; Renkert, Elisabeth; Pietrowicz, Mary; Bayan, Semirra L; Ishikawa, Keiko.
Afiliação
  • Orbelo DM; Mayo Clinic Department of Otolaryngology, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: orbelo.diana@mayo.edu.
  • Charney SA; Mayo Clinic Department of Otolaryngology, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Renkert E; Mayo Clinic Department of Otolaryngology, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Pietrowicz M; National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
  • David Aka; Mayo Clinic Department of Otolaryngology, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Bayan SL; Mayo Clinic Department of Otolaryngology, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Ishikawa K; University of Kentucky, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Lexington, Kentucky.
J Voice ; 2024 Mar 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519331
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine the effects of gargle phonation (GP) on self-perceived vocal improvement, vocal effort, acoustic parameters, and speech rate in patients with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). We hypothesized that GP would improve voice, reduce phonatory effort, and alter acoustic and speech measures. STUDY

DESIGN:

Prospective randomized, single-blind cross-over clinical trial

METHODS:

Thirty-four participants (26 females, 8 males; average age 53 years) who were diagnosed with MTD completed the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and were assigned three study conditions Baseline (B), GP, and Water Swallow (WS; sham), presented in one of two counterbalanced orders B-WS-GP (WS1st) or B-GP-WS (GP1st). Participants recorded stimuli from the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and rated their perceived vocal effort and vocal improvement. F0, vocal intensity, cepstral peak prominence (CPP), and speaking rate were measured.

RESULTS:

Average VHI-10 scores by group were 16 (min/max 2-29) for WS1st and 15 (min/max 3-40) for GP1st. About 73.5% reported more vocal improvement after GP, 17.65% after WS, and 8.8% noted no difference between conditions. Reduced effort was reported after GP, compared to B (P < 0.001) and WS (P = 0.005). Lower effort was also reported after the WS condition, compared to B (P = 0.011). Key acoustic findings included an increase in F0 after GP for sustained /i/ for females. CPP was significantly higher for females reading CAPE-V sentences after GP, when GP preceded WS, compared to B (P = 0.004) and WS (P = 0.003). Speech rate was faster for females after GP versus B (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS:

GP may be beneficial in the treatment of MTD. CPP may be a useful marker for vocal improvement after GP for women with mild MTD. Further studies would benefit from having more male participants and those with moderate and severe MTD.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Voice Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Voice Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article