Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 122 989 Patients With 592 952 Patient-Years.
Sá, Michel Pompeu; Jacquemyn, Xander; Van den Eynde, Jef; Chu, Danny; Serna-Gallegos, Derek; Ebels, Tjark; Clavel, Marie-Annick; Pibarot, Philippe; Sultan, Ibrahim.
Afiliação
  • Sá MP; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Jacquemyn X; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Van den Eynde J; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences KU Leuven Leuven Belgium.
  • Chu D; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences KU Leuven Leuven Belgium.
  • Serna-Gallegos D; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Ebels T; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Clavel MA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery University of Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Pibarot P; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute Pittsburgh PA USA.
  • Sultan I; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen The Netherlands.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(7): e033176, 2024 Apr 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533939
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

It remains controversial whether prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) impacts long-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement. We aimed to evaluate the association of PPM with mortality, rehospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by March 2023 (according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Sixty-five studies met our eligibility criteria and included 122 989 patients (any PPM 68 332 patients, 55.6%). At 25 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 11.8% and 20.6% in patients with and without any PPM, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16 [95% CI, 1.13-1.18], P<0.001). At 20 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 19.5%, 12.1%, and 8.8% in patients with no, moderate, and severe PPM, respectively (moderate versus no PPM HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.11], P<0.001; severe versus no PPM HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], P<0.001). PPM was associated with higher risk of cardiac death, heart failure-related hospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions over time (P<0.001). Statistically significant associations between PPM and worse survival were observed regardless of valve type (bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves), contemporary PPM definitions unadjusted and adjusted for body mass index, and PPM quantification method (in vitro, in vivo, Doppler echocardiography). Our meta-regression analysis revealed that populations with more women tend to have higher HRs for all-cause death associated with PPM.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of the present study suggest that any degree of PPM is associated with poorer long-term outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement and provide support for implementation of preventive strategies to avoid PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Am Heart Assoc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Am Heart Assoc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article