Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anatomy of the Lumbrical Muscles: Implications for Mechanical Advantage.
Kooi, Kevin; Legerstee, Ingmar W F; van Vliet, Eva; Freundt, Liliane A; Reikersdorfer, Kristen; Chen, Neal C; Eberlin, Kyle R.
Afiliação
  • Kooi K; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  • Legerstee IWF; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Vliet E; Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Freundt LA; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  • Reikersdorfer K; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Chen NC; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
  • Eberlin KR; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Hand (N Y) ; : 15589447241235340, 2024 Mar 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551109
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The lumbrical muscles comprise 4 intrinsic muscles of the hand and are involved in flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) and extension of the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical mechanics of the lumbrical muscles of the index, middle, ring, and small fingers.

METHODS:

We evaluated 25 cadaver arms and measured the distance between the MCPJ and fingertip, the distance between the MCPJ and lumbrical muscle insertion, and the distance between the MCPJ and the most proximal lumbrical muscle origin. With these measurements we calculated the needed force, insertion ratio (length of the proximal, middle, and distal phalanx divided by the MCPJ to insertion distance), and lumbrical muscle length.

RESULTS:

We found that the force was significantly different between all fingers, except for the comparison of the index and ring finger (P = .34). In addition, we found that muscle length was significantly different between most the fingers, except for the comparison between the index and middle fingers (P = .24), and index and ring fingers (P = .20). There was no significant difference in insertion ratio.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study suggests that the anatomical mechanics for the motor function of the lumbrical muscles are similar in all fingers. This could further imply that movements are equally precise in all fingers resulting in coordination with one another and, therefore, adequate hand function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Hand (N Y) / Hand (New York, N.Y. Online) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Hand (N Y) / Hand (New York, N.Y. Online) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos