Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of emissions across tobacco products: A slippery slope in tobacco control.
El-Hellani, Ahmad; Adeniji, Ayomipo; Erythropel, Hanno C; Wang, Qixin; Lamb, Thomas; Mikheev, Vladimir B; Rahman, Irfan; Stepanov, Irina; Strongin, Robert M; Wagener, Theodore L; Brinkman, Marielle C.
Afiliação
  • El-Hellani A; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States.
  • Adeniji A; Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States.
  • Erythropel HC; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States.
  • Wang Q; Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States.
  • Lamb T; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, United States.
  • Mikheev VB; Yale Center for the Study of Tobacco Product Use and Addiction (YCSTP), Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States.
  • Rahman I; Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
  • Stepanov I; Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
  • Strongin RM; Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, United States.
  • Wagener TL; Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States.
  • Brinkman MC; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, United States.
Tob Induc Dis ; 222024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38560551
ABSTRACT
In this narrative review, we highlight the challenges of comparing emissions from different tobacco products under controlled laboratory settings (using smoking/vaping machines). We focus on tobacco products that generate inhalable smoke or aerosol, such as cigarettes, cigars, hookah, electronic cigarettes, and heated tobacco products. We discuss challenges associated with sample generation including variability of smoking/vaping machines, lack of standardized adaptors that connect smoking/vaping machines to different tobacco products, puffing protocols that are not representative of actual use, and sample generation session length (minutes or number of puffs) that depends on product characteristics. We also discuss the challenges of physically characterizing and trapping emissions from products with different aerosol characteristics. Challenges to analytical method development are also covered, highlighting matrix effects, order of magnitude differences in analyte levels, and the necessity of tailored quality control/quality assurance measures. The review highlights two approaches in selecting emissions to monitor across products, one focusing on toxicants that were detected and quantified with optimized methods for combustible cigarettes, and the other looking for product-specific toxicants using non-targeted analysis. The challenges of data reporting and statistical analysis that allow meaningful comparison across products are also discussed. We end the review by highlighting that even if the technical challenges are overcome, emission comparison may obscure the absolute exposure from novel products if we only focus on relative exposure compared to combustible products.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Tob Induc Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Tob Induc Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos