Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing consensus-based clinical competencies to guide stroke clinicians in the implementation of psychological care in aphasia rehabilitation.
Baker, Caroline; Ryan, Brooke; Rose, Miranda L; Kneebone, Ian; Thomas, Shirley; Wong, Dana; Wallace, Sarah J.
Afiliação
  • Baker C; Speech Pathology Department, Monash Health Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Ryan B; Speech Pathology, Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Rose ML; Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Kneebone I; Discipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Thomas S; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.
  • Wong D; School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
  • Wallace SJ; Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; and Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Qld, Australia.
Brain Impair ; 252024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566294
ABSTRACT
Background People with aphasia experience depression and anxiety associated with negative outcomes across a range of time post-stroke. Stroke clinicians are well-positioned to facilitate low-intensity psychotherapeutic interventions after aphasia (e.g. mood screening, behavioural activation, problem-solving therapy, relaxation therapy); however, they self-report a lack of knowledge, skills and confidence to do so. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provides a lens through which to view and target clinician behaviours and training needs in this area of practice. The aim of this study was to develop and gain consensus on items for a rating scale of clinical competencies in facilitating individual-based, low-intensity psychotherapeutic interventions for people with aphasia. Methods An e-Delphi methodology using focus groups and survey rounds was used to gain consensus on clinical competencies considered important. Results Eight stroke clinicians (speech pathologists and psychologists), two people with aphasia and three family members participated in one of four focus groups. Four themes were derived from the data (1) Communication support, (2) Assessment and therapy structure, (3) Interpersonal skills, and (4) Needs of the significant other (family or friend). Themes informed an initial list of 23 self-rated and observer-rated competency items. Following two rounds of e-Delphi surveys, 11 stroke clinicians (six speech pathologists and five psychologists) reached consensus (80-100%) for 19 competencies. Conclusions The Psychological Care in Aphasia Rehabilitation Competency scale offers a preliminary list of items to guide and train clinicians to implement low-intensity psychotherapeutic interventions for people with aphasia.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Afasia / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Brain Impair Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Afasia / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Brain Impair Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália