Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TAVR-in-TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve for paravalvular leak.
Nagasaka, Takashi; Patel, Vivek; Koren, Ofir; Shechter, Alon; Chakravarty, Tarun; Cheng, Wen; Ishii, Hideki; Jilaihawi, Hasan; Nakamura, Mamoo; Makkar, Raj R.
Afiliação
  • Nagasaka T; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Patel V; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Koren O; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Shechter A; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Chakravarty T; Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
  • Cheng W; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Ishii H; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Jilaihawi H; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Nakamura M; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Makkar RR; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 11: 1374078, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566964
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a severe complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that can lead to poor outcomes. TAVR-in-TAVR is a promising treatment for PVL; however, reports on its safety or efficacy are limited. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable prostheses for PVLs after TAVR.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable Sapien prostheses for PVL after an initial TAVR at our institution. The procedural success, in-hospital complications, all-cause mortality, and echocardiographic data for up to 2 years post-surgery were evaluated.

Results:

In total, 31 patients with a mean age of 81.1 ± 7.9 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.8 ± 5.4% were identified. The procedural success rate of TAVR-in-TAVR was 96.8% (30/31). No in-hospital deaths, cardiac tamponade, or conversion to sternotomy occurred. Re-intervention was performed in only one patient (3.2%) during hospitalization. The all-cause mortality rates at 30 days and 2 years were 0% and 16.1%, respectively. A significant reduction in the PVL rate was observed at 30 days compared with that at baseline (p < 0.01).

Discussion:

Our findings suggest that TAVR-in-TAVR using balloon-expandable prostheses is safe and effective for PVL after TAVR with low complication rates and acceptable long-term outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos