Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic Value of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio for Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis and External Validation.
Li, Ruihua; Shen, Shuohao; Jiang, Jianjun; Liu, Yang.
Afiliação
  • Li R; Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Shen S; Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Jiang J; Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. Electronic address: jiangjianjun1995@163.com.
  • Liu Y; Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. Electronic address: liuyang_sdu@126.com.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 48-59, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582200
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prognostic value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for pulmonary embolism (PE) has been reported in several retrospective studies. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a pooled analysis and external validation of predictive value of NLR.

METHODS:

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to November 5, 2022. A random effects model was used. Grade was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. External validation was conducted in clinical cohorts before and after a propensity scoring matching (PSM). Covariates include basic clinical characteristics, such as age, gender, etc. The value of NLR in prediction model was also evaluated.

RESULTS:

A total of 15 studies comprising 5,874 patients were included. Pooled risk ratio of NLR was 2.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-2.75), with an area under the curve of 0.78 (95% CI 0.74-0.81), a sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.79), a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI 0.61-0.73), and a median cut-off value of 5.7. Grade of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty analysis showed the quality of the evidence was moderate. Before (n = 336) and after (n = 152) propensity scoring matching, risk ratio of NLR was 2.69 (95% CI 1.04-6.97) and 6.58 (95% CI 1.99-17.75). A prediction model consisting of NLR, age, D-dimer, and simplified PE severity index had an area under the curve of 0.809 (95% CI 0.738-0.88), a sensitivity of 0.638 (95% CI 0.511-0.745), and a specificity of 0.851 (95% CI 0.709-0.917). Net reclassification index (12%, P = 0.035) and integrated discrimination improvement (17%, P = 0.022) indicated an improvement caused by NLR.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prognostic value of NLR for PE was confirmed by meta-analysis and validated in an independent cohort, deserving further clinical application.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Linfócitos / Valor Preditivo dos Testes / Neutrófilos Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Linfócitos / Valor Preditivo dos Testes / Neutrófilos Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China