Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary versus de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT.
Nagler, Arnon; Labopin, Myriam; Tischer, Johanna; Raiola, Anna Maria; Kunadt, Desiree; Vydra, Jan; Blaise, Didier; Chiusolo, Patrizia; Fanin, Renato; Winkler, Julia; Forcade, Edouard; van Gorkom, Gwendolyn; Ciceri, Fabio; Mohty, Mohamad.
Afiliação
  • Nagler A; Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  • Labopin M; Hopital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
  • Tischer J; Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Munich, Germany.
  • Raiola AM; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, GENOVA, Italy.
  • Kunadt D; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Dresden, Germany.
  • Vydra J; Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Blaise D; Programme de Transplantation&Therapie Cellulaire, France.
  • Chiusolo P; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Fanin R; Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
  • Winkler J; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Forcade E; Hopital Haut-Leveque - CHU Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
  • van Gorkom G; Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Ciceri F; San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
  • Mohty M; Hôpital Saint-Antoine, INSERM UMRs 938, and Université Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Apr 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598754
ABSTRACT
We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploHSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients (pts) with primary refractory (PR) / first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (n=129) versus those of de novo AML (n=590), transplanted between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of pts with sAML versus de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs. 58.6%) (p=0.002). In 81.4% of sAML pts, the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs. 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (p=0.13). In multivariate analysis HaploHSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups; non-relapse mortality (NRM) hazard ratio (HR) =1.38 (95% CI 0.96-1.98, p=0.083), relapse incidence (RI) HR= 0.68 (95% CI 0.4.7.-1.00, p=0.051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 0.99 (95% CI 0.76-1.28, p=0.94), 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.29, p=0.97) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.77-1.27, p=0.94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of HaploHSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison to PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Adv Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Adv Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Israel