Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image Filtering to Improve Maize Tassel Detection Accuracy Using Machine Learning Algorithms.
Rodene, Eric; Fernando, Gayara Demini; Piyush, Ved; Ge, Yufeng; Schnable, James C; Ghosh, Souparno; Yang, Jinliang.
Afiliação
  • Rodene E; Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
  • Fernando GD; Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
  • Piyush V; Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
  • Ge Y; Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
  • Schnable JC; Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
  • Ghosh S; Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
  • Yang J; Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(7)2024 Mar 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610383
ABSTRACT
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based imagery has become widely used to collect time-series agronomic data, which are then incorporated into plant breeding programs to enhance crop improvements. To make efficient analysis possible, in this study, by leveraging an aerial photography dataset for a field trial of 233 different inbred lines from the maize diversity panel, we developed machine learning methods for obtaining automated tassel counts at the plot level. We employed both an object-based counting-by-detection (CBD) approach and a density-based counting-by-regression (CBR) approach. Using an image segmentation method that removes most of the pixels not associated with the plant tassels, the results showed a dramatic improvement in the accuracy of object-based (CBD) detection, with the cross-validation prediction accuracy (r2) peaking at 0.7033 on a detector trained with images with a filter threshold of 90. The CBR approach showed the greatest accuracy when using unfiltered images, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 7.99. However, when using bootstrapping, images filtered at a threshold of 90 showed a slightly better MAE (8.65) than the unfiltered images (8.90). These methods will allow for accurate estimates of flowering-related traits and help to make breeding decisions for crop improvement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zea mays / Inflorescência Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zea mays / Inflorescência Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos