Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Practices to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection: A 2021 survey of infection preventionists in US hospitals.
Pisney, Larissa; Camplese, Lisa; Greene, M Todd; Saint, Sanjay; Fowler, Karen E; Chopra, Vineet.
Afiliação
  • Pisney L; The Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Camplese L; University of Colorado Health System, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Greene MT; University of Colorado Health System, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Saint S; VA/UM Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Fowler KE; Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Chopra V; Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-5, 2024 Apr 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654493
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine prevalence of technical and behavioral interventions aimed at preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) following the COVID19 pandemic.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING:

US acute care hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS:

Infection preventionists at participating hospitals.

METHODS:

Surveys were sent to infection preventionists from a national random sample of 881 US acute care hospitals. Questions covered use of technical interventions to prevent CLABSI (eg, alcohol-containing chlorhexidine gluconate [CHG] for skin antisepsis, use of coated catheters), socio-adaptive interventions (eg, feedback of CLABSI rates, use of appropriateness criteria), and leadership support for CLABSI prevention.

RESULTS:

Survey response rate was 47% (415/881). Technical interventions such as maximal sterile barriers (99%) or CHG-impregnated dressings (92%) were highly prevalent, but routine use of CHG bathing was less common (68% indicated regular use in intensive care unit [ICU] vs 18% in non-ICU settings). Although 97% of respondents indicated use of systems to monitor CLABSI, feedback to providers on CLABSI events was reported by 89%. Only 53% of respondents indicated regular use of tools to determine appropriateness of central venous catheters (CVC). Three-quarters of respondents indicated their hospital assessed CVC necessity daily, but only 23% reported strategies to reduce routine blood cultures. CLABSI prevention was extremely important to hospital leadership at 82% of responding hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most US hospitals continue to use evidence-based methods to prevent CLABSI as recommended by leading organizations. Opportunities to focus on socio-adaptive interventions such as feedback of infection rates, use of appropriateness criteria for CVC placement, and improving the "culture of pan-culturing" remain.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos