Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceptual subitizing performance in 3- and 4-year-olds: The impact of visual features of sets.
Splinter, Suzanne Elise; Depaepe, Fien; Verschaffel, Lieven; Torbeyns, Joke.
Afiliação
  • Splinter SE; Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: suzanne.splinter@kuleuven.be.
  • Depaepe F; Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; ITEC, Imec Research Group at KU Leuven, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
  • Verschaffel L; Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
  • Torbeyns J; Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Exp Child Psychol ; 244: 105946, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705099
ABSTRACT
Perceptual subitizing is a pivotal skill in children's mathematical development. It is defined as the rapid identification of small numerosities. Previous studies pointed to the contribution of visual features of sets to perceptual subitizing performance in adults. Insights into the contribution of visual features to subitizing performance in the critical 3- to 4-year age range are scant. This study aimed to address this gap by investigating the impact of visual features on perceptual subitizing performance (accuracy and response time) in 3- and 4-year-olds. Participants (119 3- and 4-year-olds) were offered a subitizing task that incorporated pictures of sets of three to five objects. The pictures systematically varied across four visual features (a) pictorial context (distractors present vs. absent), (b) set homogeneity (homogeneous vs. heterogeneous objects), (c) set arrangement (linearly vs. randomly arranged objects), and (d) set differentiation (distinct vs. overlapping objects). Pictures with distractors, heterogeneous objects, randomly arranged objects, or overlapping objects were associated with lower subitizing accuracy and longer response times compared with pictures without distractors, homogeneous objects, linearly arranged objects, or distinct objects, respectively. Pictures with randomly arranged or overlapping objects along with distractors were associated with even lower subitizing accuracy. Pictures featuring a simple visual design-without distractors and with homogeneous, linearly arranged, and distinct sets-yielded the best subitizing performance in terms of accuracy and response time. Our findings might be explained by the cognitive processes underlying 3- and 4-year-olds' subitizing performance. The findings offer building blocks for future research in the domain and preschool educational practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tempo de Reação Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Exp Child Psychol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tempo de Reação Limite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Exp Child Psychol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article