Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methodological Quality of Clinical Trials in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.
Pupillo, Elisabetta; Al-Chalabi, Ammar; Sassi, Serena; Arippol, Emilio; Tinti, Lorenzo; Vitelli, Eugenio; Copetti, Massimiliano; Leone, Maurizio A; Bianchi, Elisa.
Afiliação
  • Pupillo E; Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Research Center for ALS, Milan, Italy.
  • Al-Chalabi A; Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Sassi S; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.
  • Arippol E; Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
  • Tinti L; Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Research Center for ALS, Milan, Italy.
  • Vitelli E; Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Research Center for ALS, Milan, Italy.
  • Copetti M; Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Research Center for ALS, Milan, Italy.
  • Leone MA; Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Research Center for ALS, Milan, Italy.
  • Bianchi E; Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
J Neuromuscul Dis ; 11(4): 749-765, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759021
ABSTRACT

Background:

More than 200 clinical trials have been performed worldwide in ALS so far, but no agents with substantial efficacy on disease progression have been found.

Objective:

To describe the methodological quality of all clinical trials performed in ALS and published before December 31, 2022.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses.

Results:

213 trials were included. 47.4% manuscripts described preclinical study evaluation, with a positive effect in all. 67.6% of trials were conducted with a parallel-arm design, while 12.7% were cross-over studies; 77% were randomized, while in 5.6% historical-controls were used for comparison. 70% of trials were double blind. Participant inclusion allowed forced vital capacity (or corresponding slow vital capacity)<50% in 15% cases, between 55-65% in 21.6%, between 70-80% in 14.1% reports, and 49.3% of the evaluated manuscripts did not provide a minimum value for respiratory capacity at inclusion. Disease duration was < 6-months in 6 studies, 7-36 months in 68, 37-60 months in 24, 8 trials requested more than 1-month of disease duration, while in 107 reports a disease duration was not described. Dropout rate was ≥20% in 30.5% trials, while it was not reported for 8.5%.

Conclusion:

The methodological quality of the included studies was highly variable. Major issues to be addressed in future ALS clinical trials include the requirement for standard animal toxicology and phase I studies, the resource-intensive nature of phase II-III studies, adequate study methodology and design, a good results reporting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neuromuscul Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Projetos de Pesquisa / Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto / Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neuromuscul Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália