Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aesthetic outcomes of different materials for delayed, single-tooth restorations for immediately placed implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Zamora, Guillermo Pardo; Molina-González, Juan Manuel; Martínez-Marco, José Francisco; Ruiz, Antonio Jose Ortiz; Mardas, Nikos; Garcia-Sanchez, Ruben.
Afiliação
  • Zamora GP; Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Molina-González JM; Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Martínez-Marco JF; Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Ruiz AJO; Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Mardas N; QMUL, Barts & The London School of Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
  • Garcia-Sanchez R; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ruben.garciasanchez@gstt.nhs.uk.
J Dent ; 146: 105067, 2024 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763385
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study is to compare the aesthetic outcomes of metal porcelain (C), lithium disilicate (T1) and porcelain-layered zirconium (T2) immediate implant-supported single crowns in the anterior maxilla. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Forty-five immediate dental implants were provided for 45 patients that required the extraction of a single tooth in the anterior maxilla. A temporary prosthesis was provided at 8 weeks after placement followed by the final prosthesis at 24 weeks post-implantation. The patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups 15 patients in the control group (C) received a metal-porcelain restoration, 15 patients (T1) received a lithium disilicate (LD) restoration and 15 patients (T2) received a porcelain-layered, zirconium (Z) restoration. Pink (PES) and White (WES) esthetic scores, radiographic bone levels, periodontal parameters and patient's esthetic satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated at the time of final restoration placement (t0) and at 12-months post-loading (t12).

RESULTS:

No implants were lost during the duration of this study. Statistically significant higher WES and VAS scores (p < 0.05) were recorded in T1 vs C and T1 vs T2 groups respectively. Similar radiographic bone levels and periodontal parameters were recorded in all groups.

CONCLUSION:

Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that T1 restorations provided better WES outcomes when compared to C restorations and better VAS scores when compared to T2 restorations at 12 months post-loading. Besides, different material interphases did not have an impact in PES, bone levels or periodontal parameters. CLINICAL RELEVANCE There is limited data comparing aesthetic outcomes of implant supported single crowns made of different ceramic materials based on accepted and comparable indexes and the evaluation of the patient's perspective regarding these aesthetic outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zircônio / Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente / Coroas / Porcelana Dentária / Estética Dentária / Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Dent / J. dent / Journal of dentistry Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zircônio / Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente / Coroas / Porcelana Dentária / Estética Dentária / Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Dent / J. dent / Journal of dentistry Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha