Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pinpointing the causal influences of stomatal anatomy and behavior on minimum, operational, and maximum leaf surface conductance.
Ochoa, Marissa E; Henry, Christian; John, Grace P; Medeiros, Camila D; Pan, Ruihua; Scoffoni, Christine; Buckley, Thomas N; Sack, Lawren.
Afiliação
  • Ochoa ME; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Henry C; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • John GP; Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
  • Medeiros CD; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Pan R; School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, China.
  • Scoffoni C; Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
  • Buckley TN; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  • Sack L; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Plant Physiol ; 196(1): 51-66, 2024 Sep 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775665
ABSTRACT
Leaf surface conductance to water vapor and CO2 across the epidermis (gleaf) strongly determines the rates of gas exchange. Thus, clarifying the drivers of gleaf has important implications for resolving the mechanisms of photosynthetic productivity and leaf and plant responses and tolerance to drought. It is well recognized that gleaf is a function of the conductances of the stomata (gs) and of the epidermis + cuticle (gec). Yet, controversies have arisen around the relative roles of stomatal density (d) and size (s), fractional stomatal opening (α; aperture relative to maximum), and gec in determining gleaf. Resolving the importance of these drivers is critical across the range of leaf surface conductances, from strong stomatal closure under drought (gleaf,min), to typical opening for photosynthesis (gleaf,op), to maximum achievable opening (gleaf,max). We derived equations and analyzed a compiled database of published and measured data for approximately 200 species and genotypes. On average, within and across species, higher gleaf,min was determined 10 times more strongly by α and gec than by d and negligibly by s; higher gleaf,op was determined approximately equally by α (47%) and by stomatal anatomy (45% by d and 8% by s), and negligibly by gec; and higher gleaf,max was determined entirely by d. These findings clarify how diversity in stomatal functioning arises from multiple structural and physiological causes with importance shifting with context. The rising importance of d relative to α, from gleaf,min to gleaf,op, enables even species with low gleaf,min, which can retain leaves through drought, to possess high d and thereby achieve rapid gas exchange in periods of high water availability.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estômatos de Plantas Idioma: En Revista: Plant Physiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estômatos de Plantas Idioma: En Revista: Plant Physiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos