Transnasal Endoscopy Acquires Esophageal Biopsies Adequate for Comprehensive Pathology Evaluation in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) does not require general anesthesia, an attractive characteristic for monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We evaluated the adequacy of TNE-obtained esophageal biopsies using the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS). METHODS: The Cincinnati Center for Eosinophilic Disorders database was searched for esophageal biopsies obtained by the same endoscopist, using either TNE or conventional endoscopy (CE). Whole-slide biopsy images were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney test was used for median (interquartile range) values and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. P ≤ .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Median age (P = .82) or height (P = .83) did not differ between TNE (n = 17) and CE (n = 17) groups. Although median largest piece size (mm2) differed between the groups (TNE 0.59 (0.45, 0.86), CE 2.24 (1.09, 2.82), P < .001), all 8 EoEHSS features were evaluated in each group; only 1 feature (lamina propria fibrosis) was missing in both groups (TNE 19/34, CE 11/34, P = .09). The median peak eosinophil count/high-power field differed (TNE 3 (0, 29), CE 16 (1, 66), P = .03), but overall grade (TNE 0.17 (0.10, 0.29), CE 0.22 (0.14, 0.46), P = .12), stage (TNE 0.14 (0.10, 0.24), CE 0.20 (0.10, 0.43), P = .15), and non-eosinophil-related individual EoEHSS scores did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: TNE- and CE-obtained esophageal biopsies are similarly sufficient for evaluation of key pathological features in EoE.