Evaluating the Need for Durotomy and Duraplasty in Adults Undergoing Suboccipital Craniectomy for Chiari Decompression: A Case Series Analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.

ABSTRACT

Background Suboccipital craniectomy (SOC) in conjunction with dura opening and duraplasty for posterior fossa decompression is an effective treatment for symptomatic Chiari 1 malformations (CM1), primarily carried out in the pediatric population. However, dural opening and reconstruction are associated with an increased risk of complications, and their necessity in the adult population has not yet been robustly demonstrated. Given differences in clinical presentation and disease severity between the pediatric and adult patients, we aimed to identify if SOC alone with intraoperative ultrasound confirmation of adequate restoration of pulsatile motion of cerebellar tonsil is sufficient to treat symptomatic CM1 while mitigating surgical risks. Methods We identified a retrospective, institutional cohort of adult patients who underwent SOC for Chiari decompression between 2014 and 2023. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic features were extracted for each patient. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) and Motor-Sensory-Sphincter signs score (Clinical Sign Score (CSS)). Radiographic outcomes assessed cerebellar ectopia and associated syrinx characteristics. Results A total of 15 patients were identified, with an average follow-up period of three years. Eight patients underwent SOC with duraplasty, whereas seven patients underwent SOC only without duraplasty. Both groups of patients were of similar age at surgery and had similar nature and duration of symptoms prior to surgery. On pre-operative radiographic evaluation, both groups of patients had similar lengths of cerebellar ectopia (9.9±11.0 mm to 11.1±5.7 mm, p=0.591), and associated syrinxes (75% vs. 42.9%, p=0.205). Intraoperatively, both groups had similar estimated blood losses, though the length of surgery was significantly shorter when durotomy was spared (202±58.3 minutes to 116.3±47.8 minutes, p=0.011). The length of ICU stay was also significantly longer in the durotomy group (1.1±0.6 days to 0.0 days, p<0.001). Neither group reported any post-operative complications. On follow-up, both groups demonstrated similar reductions in cerebellar ectopia and syrinx characteristics. Clinically, the CCOS and CSS scores were similar between the two cohorts at follow-up, with no repeat surgery required in either group. Conclusion Our cohort suggests that for adult CM1 patients, SOC decompression alone without dural reconstruction might lead to comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes to SOC decompression with durotomy/duraplasty, especially if intraoperative ultrasound confirms good cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow after SOC. Notably, sparing durotomy and duraplasty is also associated with decreased operative time and decreased ICU stay.