Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosing Cefazolin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Infusion?-A Pilot Study.
Yu, Yichao; Dooley, F Cole; Woods, Anna; Gunnett, Amy; Chandasana, Hardik; Amini, Elham; Garvan, Cynthia; Ihnow, Stephanie; Blakemore, Laurel C; Sangari, Taran; Seubert, Christoph N.
Afiliação
  • Yu Y; Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Dooley FC; Drug Development, Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT 06810, USA.
  • Woods A; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Gunnett A; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Chandasana H; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Amini E; Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Garvan C; Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling, and Simulation, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.
  • Ihnow S; Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Blakemore LC; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA 94404, USA.
  • Sangari T; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
  • Seubert CN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610, FL, USA.
J Clin Med ; 13(12)2024 Jun 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38930053
ABSTRACT

Background:

Cefazolin may minimize the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Cefazolin dosing recommendations vary and there is limited evidence for achieved tissue concentrations.

Methods:

We performed a randomized, controlled, prospective pharmacokinetic pilot study of 12 patients given cefazolin by either intermittent bolus (30 mg/kg every 3 h) or continuous infusion (30 mg/kg bolus followed by 10/mg/kg per hour) during PSF for AIS.

Results:

Patients were well matched for demographic and perioperative variables. While total drug exposure, measured as area-under-the-curve (AUC), was similar in plasma for bolus and infusion dosing, infusion dosing achieved greater cefazolin exposure in subcutaneous and muscle tissue. Using the pharmacodynamic metric of time spent above minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), both bolus and infusion dosing performed well. However, when targeting a bactericidal concentration of 32 µg/mL, patients in the bolus group spent a median of 1/5 and 1/3 of the typical 6 h operative time below target in subcutaneous and muscle tissue, respectively.

Conclusions:

We conclude that intraoperative determination of cefazolin tissue concentrations is feasible and both bolus and infusion dosing of cefazolin achieve concentrations in excess of typical MICs. Infusion dosing appears to more consistently achieve bactericidal concentrations in subcutaneous and muscle tissues.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos