Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Pharmacist Interventions With Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events.
Kelly, W N; Ho, M J; Smith, T; Bullers, K; Bates, D W; Kumar, A.
Afiliação
  • Kelly WN; Taneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Ho MJ; Taneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Smith T; Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Bullers K; Shimberg Library, USF Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Bates DW; Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Kumar A; Research Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(7): e5853, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973415
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a frequent cause of injury in patients. Our aim was to assess whether pharmacist interventions compared with no pharmacist intervention results in reduced ADEs and potential adverse drug events (PADEs).

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and two other databases through September 19, 2022 for any RCT assessing the effect of a pharmacist intervention compared with no pharmacist intervention and reporting on ADEs or PADEs. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for RCTs. A random-effects model was used to pool summary results from individual RCTs.

RESULTS:

Fifteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed a statistically significant reduction in ADE associated with pharmacist intervention compared with no pharmacist intervention (RR = 0.86; [95% CI 0.80-0.94]; p = 0.0005) but not for PADEs (RR = 0.79; [95% CI 0.47-1.32]; p = 0.37). The heterogeneity was insignificant (I2 = 0%) for ADEs and substantial (I2 = 77%) for PADEs. Patients receiving a pharmacist intervention were 14% less likely for ADE than those who did not receive a pharmacist intervention. The estimated number of patients needed to prevent one ADE across all patient locations was 33.

CONCLUSIONS:

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs seeking to understand the association of pharmacist interventions with ADEs and PADEs. The risk of having an ADE is reduced by a seventh for patients receiving a pharmacist care intervention versus no such intervention. The estimated number of patients needed to be followed across all patient locations to prevent one preventable ADE across all patient locations is 33.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacêuticos / Papel Profissional / Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacêuticos / Papel Profissional / Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos