Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methodological Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treatment Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE REX Tools.
Vilela, Ana Paula Oliveira; Deffert, Flávia; Lucchetta, Rosa Camila; da Silva Pires, Yara Maria; Mainka, Felipe Fernando; Tonin, Fernanda S; Pontarolo, Roberto.
Afiliação
  • Vilela APO; Pharmaceutical Assistance Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
  • Deffert F; Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
  • Lucchetta RC; Health Technology Assessment Unit, Oswaldo Cruz German Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • da Silva Pires YM; Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
  • Mainka FF; Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
  • Tonin FS; Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. fernanda.tonin@estesl.ipl.pt.
  • Pontarolo R; H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Av. Dom João II Lote 4.69 01, 1990-096, Lisbon, Portugal. fernanda.tonin@estesl.ipl.pt.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980530
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with a poor prognosis, and its management should be grounded in well-developed clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Thus, we critically assess the methodological quality of the available CPG for pharmacological treatments for PAH.

METHODS:

A systematic review (CRD42023387168) was performed in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Tripdatabase (Jan-2023). Eligible records were appraised by four reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation Collaboration tool (AGREE II) and the complementary tool for assessing recommendations' quality and certainty, AGREE REX. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.

RESULTS:

Overall, 31 guidelines, mainly authored by professional societies (90%), targeting only physicians as primary users (84%), were identified. Guidelines presented a moderate overall quality (scores of 63% and 51% in AGREE II and AGREE REX, respectively), with a few domains showing slight improvements over the years. AGREE II "Scope and Purpose" (94%) and "Presentation Clarity" (99%) domains obtained the highest scores. The items related to "Stakeholder involvement," "Editorial independence," and "Clinical applicability" (AGREE REX) were fairly reported. Conversely, CPG lacks rigor in development (32% score, AGREE II), scarcely discusses the role of stakeholders, and provides deficient data on the implementation of recommendations (scores of 35% and 46% in AGREE II and AGREE REX, respectively). No differences in the quality of guidelines published by different developers or countries were observed (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Methodological weaknesses are common among guidelines addressing PAH treatment, especially regarding scientific rigor, stakeholders' values and preferences, and facilitators and barriers to implementability. Particular attention should be given to developing future guidelines.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil