Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing a Collaborative Orthoplastic Approach for the Management of Primary Musculoskeletal Neoplasms: An 8-year Case Series.
Byrnes, Yasmeen M; Makar, Gabriel; Madera, Joshua D; Ruffino, Amanda E; Frank, Katie; Bowen, Thomas R; Devitt, Sean M.
Afiliação
  • Byrnes YM; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa.
  • Makar G; Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa.
  • Madera JD; Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pa.
  • Ruffino AE; Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pa.
  • Frank K; Biostatistics Core, Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa.
  • Bowen TR; Geisinger Musculoskeletal Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa.
  • Devitt SM; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(7): e5971, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988480
ABSTRACT
Orthoplastic surgery is a multidisciplinary approach that is well-studied for extremity trauma, but not for musculoskeletal oncologic reconstruction. Here, the authors describe the application of a collaborative orthoplastic approach for the management of primary musculoskeletal neoplasms and evaluate its impact. The collaboration protocol, implemented in July 2019, comprises specific checkpoints of interdisciplinary co-management, which span the pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment period. This involves direct communication between attending surgeons and their respective clinical teams. Patients who underwent resection of a primary musculoskeletal neoplasm between March 2014 and April 2022 were retrospectively categorized into conventional or collaboration groups. Of the 136 total patients, there were 63.2% (n = 86) conventional and 36.8% (n = 50) collaboration; 31.6% (n = 43) had reconstruction and 68.4% (n = 93) did not. Compared with the conventional group, the collaboration group had significantly higher rates of diabetes (18% versus 7%, P = 0.048) and radiation treatment (68% versus 43%, P = 0.005). The collaboration group was significantly more likely to have plastic surgery involvement in their care than the conventional group (38% versus 14%, P = 0.001), and to undergo reconstruction (42% versus 26%, P = 0.047). The groups showed no difference in rates of hematoma, seroma, delayed healing, infection, 30- or 90-day reoperation, or partial or complete flap/graft failure. The collaborative approach described here is feasible and associated with increased plastic surgery involvement and reconstructive surgery. Complications were equivalent despite evidence suggesting increased case complexity in the collaboration group. These early results are promising and could inspire wider adoption of structured orthoplastic protocols for care of these patients.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article