Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Composite Pulmonary Embolism Shock Score and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism.
Zhang, Robert S; Yuriditsky, Eugene; Zhang, Peter; Maqsood, Muhammad H; Amoroso, Nancy E; Maldonado, Thomas S; Xia, Yuhe; Horowitz, James M; Bangalore, Sripal.
Afiliação
  • Zhang RS; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University. (R.S.Z., E.Y., J.M.H., S.B.).
  • Yuriditsky E; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University. (R.S.Z., E.Y., J.M.H., S.B.).
  • Zhang P; Department of Medicine, New York University. (P.Z.).
  • Maqsood MH; Department of Cardiology, DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, TX (M.H.M.).
  • Amoroso NE; Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, New York University. (N.E.A.).
  • Maldonado TS; Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, New York University School of Medicine (T.S.M.).
  • Xia Y; Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine (Y.X.).
  • Horowitz JM; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University. (R.S.Z., E.Y., J.M.H., S.B.).
  • Bangalore S; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University. (R.S.Z., E.Y., J.M.H., S.B.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; : e014088, 2024 Jul 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994599
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the Composite Pulmonary Embolism Shock (CPES) score predicts normotensive shock. However, it is unknown if CPES predicts adverse clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether the CPES score predicts in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic deterioration.

METHODS:

Patients with acute intermediate-risk PE admitted from October 2016 to July 2019 were included. CPES was calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hemodynamic decompensation. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome. The association of CPES with primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS:

Among the 207 patients with intermediate-risk PE (64.7% with intermediate-high risk PE), 29 (14%) patients had a primary outcome event. In a multivariable model, a higher CPES score was associated with a worse primary composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.29-2.54]; P=0.001). Moreover, a higher CPES score predicted death (aHR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.04-2.96]; P=0.033), resuscitated cardiac arrest (aHR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.17-3.38]; P=0.011), and hemodynamic decompensation (aHR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.34-2.89]; P=0.001). A high CPES score (≥3) was associated with the worse primary outcome when compared with patients with a low CPES score (22% versus 2.4%; P=0.003; aHR, 6.48 [95% CI, 1.49-28.04]; P=0.012). CPES score provided incremental prognostic value for the prediction of primary outcome over baseline demographics and European Society of Cardiology intermediate-risk subcategories (global Χ2 value increased from 0.63 to 1.39 to 13.69; P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with acute intermediate-risk PE, the CPES score effectively risk stratifies and prognosticates patients for the prediction of clinical events and provides incremental value over baseline demographics and European Society of Cardiology intermediate-risk subcategories.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article