Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research.
Earl, Jake; Dawson, Liza; Rid, Annette.
Afiliação
  • Earl J; Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
  • Dawson L; Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
  • Rid A; National Institutes of Health.
Am J Bioeth ; : 1-17, 2024 Jul 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007856
ABSTRACT
Clinical researchers should help respect the autonomy and promote the well-being of prospective study participants by helping them make voluntary, informed decisions about enrollment. However, participants often exhibit poor understanding of important information about clinical research. Bioethicists have given special attention to "misconceptions" about clinical research that can compromise participants' decision-making, most notably the "therapeutic misconception." These misconceptions typically involve false beliefs about a study's purpose, or risks or potential benefits for participants. In this article, we describe a misconception involving false beliefs about a study's potential benefits for non-participants, or its expected social value. This social value misconception can compromise altruistically motivated participants' decision-making, potentially threatening their autonomy and well-being. We show how the social value misconception raises ethical concerns for inherently low-value research, hyped research, and even ordinary research, and advocate for empirical and normative work to help understand and counteract this misconception's potential negative impacts on participants.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Bioeth Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Bioeth Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article