Dual-Split CT to Simulate Multiple Radiation Doses From a Single Scan-Liver Lesion Detection Compared With Dose-Matched Single-Energy CT.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential use of simulated radiation doses from a dual-split CT scan for dose optimization by comparing their lesion detectability to dose-matched single-energy CT acquisitions at different radiation dose levels using a mathematical model observer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with liver lesions (5-10 mm, both hyperattenuating and hypoattenuating) was imaged using a third-generation dual-source CT in single-energy dual-source mode at 100 kVp and 3 radiation doses (5, 2.5, 1.25 mGy). The tube current was 67% for tube A and 33% for tube B. For each dose, 5 simulated radiation doses (100%, 67%, 55%, 45%, 39%, and 33%) were generated through linear image blending. The phantom was also imaged using traditional single-source single-energy mode at equivalent doses. Each setup was repeated 10 times. Image noise texture was evaluated by the average spatial frequency (fav) of the noise power spectrum. Liver lesion detection was measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), using a channelized Hotelling model observer with 10 dense Gaussian channels. RESULTS: Fav decreased at lower radiation doses and differed between simulated and single-energy images (eg, 0.16 mm-1 vs 0.14 mm-1 for simulated and single-energy images at 1.25 mGy), indicating slightly blotchier noise texture for dual-split CT. For hyperattenuating lesions, the mean AUC ranged between 0.92-0.99, 0.81-0.96, and 0.68-0.89 for single-energy, and between 0.91-0.99, 0.78-0.91, and 0.70-0.85 for dual-split at 5 mGy, 2.5 mGy, and 1.25 mGy, respectively. For hypoattenuating lesions, the AUC ranged between 0.90-0.98, 0.75-0.93, and 0.69-0.86 for the single-energy, and between 0.92-0.99, 0.76-0.87, and 0.67-0.81 for dual-split at 5 mGy, 2.5 mGy, and 1.25 mGy, respectively. AUC values were similar between both modes at 5 mGy, and slightly lower, albeit not significantly, for the dual-split mode at 2.5 and 1.25 mGy. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion detectability was comparable between multiple simulated radiation doses from a dual-split CT scan and dose-matched single-energy CT. Noise texture was slightly blotchier in the simulated images. Simulated doses using dual-split CT can be used to assess the impact of radiation dose reduction on lesion detectability without the need for repeated patient scans.