Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Genomic testing for differences of sex development: Practices and perceptions of clinicians.
Atlas, Gabby; Hanna, Chloe; Tan, Tiong Yang; Nisselle, Amy; Tucker, Elena; Ayers, Katie; Sinclair, Andrew; O'Connell, Michele A.
Afiliação
  • Atlas G; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hanna C; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tan TY; Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Nisselle A; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tucker E; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ayers K; Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Sinclair A; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • O'Connell MA; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39155615
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the approach taken by clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of individuals with Differences of Sex Development (DSD), particularly with regard to genomic testing, and identify perceived gaps/strengths/barriers in current practice. DESIGN AND

METHODS:

An anonymous online survey was developed, with questions exploring demographics, perceptions of genomic testing, availability of genetics services and opinions on the role and utility of genomic testing in DSD. All responses were anonymous. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of individuals with DSD were recruited from relevant societies and departments across Australia and New Zealand.

RESULTS:

79 eligible clinicians commenced the survey, with 63 completing it and 16 providing a partial response. The perceived benefit of having a genetic diagnosis for DSD was almost unanimous (97%). Almost half (48%) of respondents reported barriers in genomic testing. 81% of respondents reported they order genomic tests currently. Approaches to genomic testing when faced with four different clinical scenarios varied across respondents. Clinicians perceived genomic testing to be underutilised (median 36 on sliding scale from 0 to 100).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite 97% of respondents reporting benefit of a genetic diagnosis for individuals with DSD, this was not reflected throughout the survey with regard to clinical implementation. When faced with clinical scenarios, the recommendations for genomic testing from respondents was much lower, indicating the discrepancy between perception and clinical practice. Genomic testing in the context of DSD is seen as both beneficial and desired, yet there are multiple barriers impacting its integration into standard clinical care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália