Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Sarcoma Awareness Among the General Population in Minnesota: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study from the Minnesota State Fair in 2015 and 2022.
Fride, Nea; Nachbor, Kristine M; Nelson, Alexander T; Snook, Kirsten; Shaker, Rami M; Mavrommatis, Sophia; Seaver, Christopher D; Semanko, Lachelle; Bedi, Manpreet; Keeler, Elsa; Dusenbery, Kathryn E; Retzlaff, Amber A.
Afiliação
  • Fride N; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Nachbor KM; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Nelson AT; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Snook K; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Shaker RM; Department of Medicine, UnityPoint Health, University of Iowa, Des Moines, IA, USA.
  • Mavrommatis S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Seaver CD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
  • Semanko L; Rein in Sarcoma, Fridley, MN, USA.
  • Bedi M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center - Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Keeler E; Rein in Sarcoma, Fridley, MN, USA.
  • Dusenbery KE; Rein in Sarcoma, Fridley, MN, USA.
  • Retzlaff AA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Cancer Educ ; 2024 Aug 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39158629
ABSTRACT
Sarcomas are commonly misdiagnosed, and treatment delays negatively impact patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to explore patient threshold for and timeline to medical evaluation, to identify providers most likely to be contacted first, and to assess general sarcoma knowledge in Minnesota's general population. Voluntary participants were recruited at the 2015 and 2022 Minnesota State Fair to complete a three-part survey. Part 1 assessed evaluation timeline and provider choice, part 2 evaluated sarcoma knowledge via a ten-question survey, and part 3 documented demographics. Responses were electronically recorded, and results were tabulated. Overall, 2124 participants completed some or all of the survey. Part 1 Participants indicated they would seek more urgent treatment for a painful mass compared to a non-painful mass (p < 0.001). The majority (77%) of participants indicated a family medicine physician would be their first contact for painful and non-painful masses. Part 2 There was no difference in overall score (percent correct) when comparing results from 2015 (mean = 40%) to 2022 (mean = 42%) (p = 0.183). Overall, 16% (349/2117) of participants had no correct responses. Individuals who self-identified as Hispanic or Latino ethnicity and a non-White race performed worse (p < 0.001). In general, scores improved with increased education and those with a graduate or professional degree had an estimated 2.515-point increase in score compared to participants with some high school education or high school diploma/general education diploma (p < 0.001). Participants with a healthcare background scored better (p < 0.001). Pain is a driving factor for patient-initiated evaluation, and primary care providers are the most likely first contact for patients. General sarcoma awareness remains low, even among those with advanced degrees and healthcare experience. Ongoing educational efforts are warranted for both the general public and healthcare communities in Minnesota.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos