Comparative Biophysical Study of Clinical Surfactants using Constrained Drop Surfactometry.

ABSTRACT

Surfactant replacement therapy is crucial in managing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Currently licensed clinical surfactants in the United States and Europe, including Survanta, Infasurf, Curosurf, and Alveofact, are all derived from bovine or porcine sources. We conducted a comprehensive examination of the biophysical properties of these four clinical surfactant preparations under physiologically relevant conditions, utilizing constrained drop surfactometry (CDS). The assessed biophysical properties included the adsorption rate, quasi-static and dynamic surface activity, resistance to surfactant inhibition by meconium, and the morphology of the adsorbed surfactant films. This comparative study unveiled distinct in vitro biophysical properties of these clinical surfactants and revealed correlations between their chemical composition, lateral film structure, and biophysical functionality. Notably, at 1 mg/mL, Survanta exhibited a significantly lower adsorption rate compared to the other preparations at the same surfactant concentration. At 10 mg/mL, Infasurf, Curosurf, and Survanta all demonstrated excellent dynamic surface activity, while Alveofact exhibited the poorest quasi-static and dynamic surface activity. The suboptimal surface activity of Alveofact is found to be correlated with its unique monolayer-predominant morphology, in contrast to other surfactants forming multilayers. Curosurf, in particular, showcased superior resistance to biophysical inhibition by meconium compared to other preparations. Understanding the diverse biophysical behaviors of clinical surfactants provides crucial insights for precision and personalized design in treating RDS and other respiratory conditions. The findings from this study contribute valuable perspectives for development of more efficacious and fully synthetic surfactant preparations.