Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A UK-wide survey of community forensic services for adults with intellectual disability and/or autism.
McKinnon, Iain; Whitehouse, Ellen; Harris, Melissa; Ciausu, Vlad; McCarthy, Jane; Sheehan, Rory.
Afiliação
  • McKinnon I; Secure Services, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; and Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
  • Whitehouse E; School of Psychology, Newcastle University, UK.
  • Harris M; Secure Services, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Ciausu V; Secure Services, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • McCarthy J; Learning Disability Service, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK; and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
  • Sheehan R; Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, Dartford, UK.
BJPsych Open ; 10(5): e148, 2024 Aug 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160678
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Specialist forensic community teams for people with intellectual disability and/or autism have been developed, but little is known about their extent and delivery.

AIMS:

To describe specialist forensic community teams for people with intellectual disability and/or autism across the UK.

METHOD:

An online survey was sent to representatives of each UK Trust/Health Board providing adult mental health and/or intellectual disability services. Questions covered the availability, structure and activities of specialist community forensic services. Quantitative data were summarised and associations between access to specialist forensic teams and care were tested with Chi-squared tests. Thematic analysis of free-text survey responses was used to understand the challenges of providing community forensic mental health services for this group.

RESULTS:

A total of 49 out of 78 (63%) eligible Trusts/Health Boards responded, of which 25 (51%) had access to a specialist forensic community team. Teams operated either as part of a single Trust/Board (n = 13) or over a larger regional footprint (n = 12). The availability of specialist forensic community teams was associated with better access to offence-related interventions (χ2 = 15.1002, P < 0.005) and co-production of patient care plans (χ2 = 7.8726, P = 0.005). Respondents reported a wide variation in availability, expertise and perceived quality of community services. The availability of secure and generic in-patient beds, commissioning and legal barriers were also significant challenges in providing appropriate care.

CONCLUSIONS:

Coverage of specialist community forensic teams is not universal. There are indications that such teams are associated with improved care processes, but further work is needed to establish longer-term outcomes and the optimal model of care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJPsych Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article