Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of proprioception measures of the lumbar spine.
Larivière, C; Eskandari, A H; Mecheri, H; Duclos, C.
Afiliação
  • Larivière C; Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: larchr@irsst.qc.ca.
  • Eskandari AH; Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Mecheri H; Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Duclos C; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; École de réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 78: 102924, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39182462
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To better personalize treatment and monitor recovery of individuals with low back pain, objective tests of sensorimotor functions, such as lumbar proprioception, must be selected based on their reliability and validity. The primary objective of this study was to test the concurrent validity of three measures of lumbar proprioception.

METHODS:

Thirty-one participants performed three lumbar proprioception tests (motion perception threshold, active and passive joint positioning sense), a whole-body mobility and balance (time up-and-go) and two trunk-specific postural control (threshold of stability and sensor-based sway measures) tests.

RESULTS:

Only the motion perception threshold proprioception test showed some validity, correlating with the trunk-specific postural control tests [r range (positive values) 0.37 to 0.60]. The three lumbar proprioception measures were not correlated to each other. The threshold of stability measure was correlated with the time up-and-go (r = 0.37) and trunk-specific (sensor-based sway measures) postural control [r range (positive values) 0.48 to 0.77] tests.

CONCLUSION:

The present study generated three original findings. Only the motion perception threshold proprioception test demonstrated its concurrent validity. In fact, the three lumbar proprioception tests performed in the present study were not correlated to each other, thus assessing different constructs. Finally, the threshold of stability protocol was validated against other tests. These findings will help in selecting the most appropriate lumbar proprioception measures to study the effects of exercise treatments in patients with back pain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propriocepção / Equilíbrio Postural / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Electromyogr Kinesiol / J. electromyogr. kinesiol / Journal of electromyography and kinesiology Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propriocepção / Equilíbrio Postural / Vértebras Lombares Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Electromyogr Kinesiol / J. electromyogr. kinesiol / Journal of electromyography and kinesiology Assunto da revista: FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article