Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Effectiveness of Dupilumab and Omalizumab on Asthma Exacerbations and Systemic Corticosteroid Prescriptions: Real-World US ADVANTAGE Study.
Bleecker, Eugene; Blaiss, Michael; Jacob-Nara, Juby; Huynh, Lynn; Duh, Mei Sheng; Guo, Tracy; Ye, Mingchen; Stanford, Richard H; Wang, Zhixiao; Soler, Xavier; Nag, Arpita; Nair, Radhika; Borsos, Kinga.
Afiliação
  • Bleecker E; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
  • Blaiss M; Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
  • Jacob-Nara J; Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ.
  • Huynh L; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
  • Duh MS; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
  • Guo T; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
  • Ye M; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA.
  • Stanford RH; AESARA, Inc, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: Richard.stanford@aesara.com.
  • Wang Z; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY.
  • Soler X; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY.
  • Nag A; Sanofi, Cambridge, MA.
  • Nair R; Sanofi, Cambridge, MA.
  • Borsos K; Sanofi, Cambridge, MA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39186985
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the US, dupilumab is approved for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, while omalizumab is approved for managing moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. However, limited comparative effectiveness data exist for these biologics due to differing patient characteristics and treatment histories.

OBJECTIVE:

This analysis assessed the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab for asthma among patients in the US.

METHODS:

In this retrospective observational study, TriNetX Dataworks electronic medical record data were used to identify asthma patients (age ≥12 years) who initiated (index) dupilumab or omalizumab between November 2018 and September 2020, and who had at least 12 months of pre- and post-index clinical information. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance potential confounding in treatment groups. Asthma exacerbation rates and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions were compared using a doubly robust negative binomial regression model, adjusting for baseline exacerbation/SCS rates and patient characteristics with ≥10% standardized differences after IPTW.

RESULTS:

Overall, 2,138 patients in dupilumab and 1,313 in omalizumab treatment groups met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. After weighting, the majority of baseline characteristics were balanced (standard difference <10%) between the two groups. Dupilumab was associated with a 44% lower asthma exacerbation rate (p<0.0001) than omalizumab. Additionally, dupilumab treatment significantly (p<0.05) reduced SCS prescriptions by 28% during the follow-up period compared to omalizumab treatment.

CONCLUSION:

The US ADVANTAGE real-world study demonstrated a significant reduction in severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions for patients prescribed dupilumab compared to those prescribed omalizumab during 12 months of follow-up.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Azerbaidjão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Azerbaidjão