Comparison of Candida colonization in intensive care unit patients with and without COVID-19: First prospective cohort study from Turkey.

Candida species are the primary cause of fungal infections in intensive care units (ICUs). Despite the increasing prevalence of Candida-related infections, monitoring the progression of these infections from colonization in COVID-19 ICU patients lacks sufficient information. This study aims prospectively to compare 62 COVID-19 and 60 non-COVID-19 ICU patients from admission to discharge in terms of colonization development, rates, isolated Candida species, risk factors, and Candida infections during hospitalization. A total of 1464 samples were collected at specific time intervals from various body sites [mouth, skin (axilla), rectal, and urine]. All samples were inoculated onto CHROMagar Candida and CHROMagar Candida Plus media, and isolates identified using MALDI-TOF MS. COVID-19 patients exhibited significantly higher colonization rates in oral, rectal, and urine samples compared to non-COVID-19 patients, (p < 0.05). Among the Candida species, non-albicans Candida was more frequently detected in COVID-19 patients, particularly in oral (75.8%-25%; p < 0.001) and rectal regions (74.19% - 46.66%; p < 0.05). Colonization with mixed Candida species was also more prevalent in the oropharyngeal region (p < 0.05). Mechanical ventilation and corticosteroid use emerged as elevated risk factors among COVID-19 patients (p < 0.05). Despite the colonization prevalence, both COVID-19-positive and negative patients exhibited low incidences of Candida infections, with rates of 9.67% (n = 6/62) and 6.67% (n = 3/60), respectively. Consequently, although Candida colonization rates were higher in COVID-19 ICU patients, there was no significant difference in Candida infection development compared to the non-COVID-19 group. However, the elevated rate of non-albicans Candida isolates highlights potential future infections, particularly given their intrinsic resistance in prophylactic or empirical treatments if needed. Additionally, the high rate of mixed colonization emphasizes the importance of using chromogenic media for routine evaluation.

This is the first prospective cohort study comparing Candida colonization features including species and body sites from the time of admission to the externalization in intensive care unit patients with and without COVID-19. It provides key points that can be referenced for fungal approaches in future disasters.

Evaluation of the first Candida auris isolates reported from Türkiye in terms of identification by various methods and susceptibility to antifungal drugs.

PURPOSE: Candida auris is increasingly being isolated from patients all over the world. It has five clades. In this study, it was aimed to compare the results of biochemical tests obtained using different methods and the antifungal susceptibility profiles of C. auris strains isolated from the first seven cases reported in Türkiye, and evaluate whether this information could be useful as preliminary data in determining the clade of strains in centers that lack the opportunity to apply molecular methods. METHODS: Identification test results obtained using API ID 32 C, API 20 C AUX, VITEK-2 YST, and MALDI-TOF MS; colony color and morphology on Chromagar Candida, CHROMagar Candida Plus media, and cornmeal-Tween 80 agar; susceptibility to antifungals were tested and compared. Antifungal susceptibility test was studied using microdilution method according to the recommendations of EUCAST. Additionally, a pilot study was conducted to investigate the value of CHROMagar Candida Plus. RESULTS: All seven strains were identified as Lachancea kluyveri with API ID 32 C, Rhodotorula glutinis; Cryptococcus neoformans with API 20 C AUX, and C. auris with both VITEK-2 YST and MALDI-TOF MS. MIC values for fluconazole were very high (≥64 mg/L) for all seven strains. It was observed that 11 (37.9%) of 29 Candida parapsilosis strains formed colonies with morphology similar to C. auris on CHROMagar Candida Plus medium, leading to false positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Although there have been many isolations of C. auris in our country in recent years, clade distribution of only a small number of strains is known yet. In this study, when the biochemical properties and antifungal susceptibility profiles of the seven strains were evaluated, it was concluded that they exhibited some characteristics compatible with clade I. It was also observed that strains 1 and 2 may belong to a different clade.

Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients.

Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood culture analyses were performed using the BD Bactec FX automated system. Identification was carried out using conventional methods, namely, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. Culture positivity was detected in 1630 samples from 652 patients. Of these 652 patients, 633 were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi that were isolated at the highest rate in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), Escherichia coli (12.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.4%), Candida albicans (1.65%), and Candida glabrata complex (1.65%), while in the negative patients, the highest rates were for E. coli (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), K. pneumoniae (12.05%), C. albicans (2.1%), Candida parapsilosis (1.1%), and Candida tropicalis (0.9%). No statistically significant difference was determined between COVID-19-positive and negative patients in terms of detection, such as with the Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp., and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the blood cultures (p > 0.05). The most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (p = 0.028). Acinetobacter baumannii was more frequent (p = 0.004) and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was isolated at a higher rate (60% vs. 43%) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (p > 0.05). These findings highlight the fact that isolation procedures should not be disregarded and the distribution of bacterial/fungal agents of bloodstream infections and their antibiotic resistance should be followed up during a pandemic, such as in the case of COVID-19.