A Step-Up Approach Using Alternative Endoscopic Modalities Is an Effective Strategy for Postoperative and Traumatic Pancreatic Duct Disruption.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standard endotherapy for pancreatic duct (PD) disruption is pancreatic stenting and sphincterotomy. In patients refractory to standard treatment, treatment algorithm is currently not standardized. This study aims to report the 10-year experience with the endoscopic treatment of postoperative or traumatic PD disruption and to share our algorithmic approach. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 30 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for postoperative (n = 26) or traumatic (n = 4) PD disruption between 2011 and 2021. Standard treatment was initially applied to all patients. Endoscopic modalities used with a step-up approach in patients unresponsive to standard treatment were stent upsizing and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrilate (NBCA) injection for partial disruption, and the bridging of the disruption with a stent and cystogastrostomy for complete disruption. RESULTS: PD disruption was partial in 26 and complete in 4 patients. Cannulation and stenting of PD was successful in all patients and sphincterotomy was performed in 22 patients. Standard treatment was successful in 20 patients (66.6%). The resolution of PD disruption in 9 of 10 patients refractory to standard treatment was achieved with stent upsizing in 4, NBCA injection in 2, the bridging of the complete disruption in one, and cystogastrostomy after spontaneously and intentionally developed pseudocyst in one patient each. Overall, therapeutic success rate was 96.6% (100% for partial, 75% for complete disruption). Procedural complications occurred in 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Standart treatment for PD disruption is usually effective. In patients refractory to standard treatment, the outcome may be improved by step-up approach using alternative endoscopic modalities.

Magnetic Compression Anastomosis Is a Good Treatment Option for Patients with Completely Obstructed Benign Biliary Strictures: A Case Series Study.

BACKGROUND: Completely obstructed benign biliary strictures (BBS) is a difficult-to-treat condition. Surgery is the main treatment modality with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, the magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) technique was employed in such cases with low complication rates. AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of the MCA in completely obstructed BBS. METHODS: 21 MCA procedures were performed in 19 patients with completely obstructed BBS. All patients had percutaneous biliary access. Magnets were located to the proximal side of the obstruction via percutaneous biliary sheath and the distal side endoscopically. The procedure was terminated as the magnets attracted. Either self-expandable fully covered metallic stent and/or a growing number of plastic stents were introduced after recanalization was achieved. RESULT: A total number of 19 patients with completely obstructed BBS resulting from cholecystectomy or liver transplant underwent 21 MCA procedures. Among those, 19 (90.5%) interventions were successful. The median stricture length that had been measured after magnet attraction was 4 mm (range 1-10 mm). The median magnet coupling time in successful cases was 9 days (range 4-27 days). No correlation was found between magnet coupling time and stricture length (p = 0.27). Complications were observed in 6 (cholangitis:1, magnet migration:2, magnet entrapment:3) of 19 successful MCA procedures. Fifteen of the 19 successful procedures had at least a period of stent-free follow-up. Recurrence of stenosis occurred in 7 procedures, of which 4 remained stent-free with retreatment. Eventually, 12 procedures had stent-free last status. CONCLUSIONS: MCA is an effective and safe treatment option in completely obstructed BBS. Further studies are required for procedural standardization.

A comparative study of side-viewing duodenoscope and forward-viewing gastroscope to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy is a difficult procedure. Although different endoscopes are used in these patients, comparative studies are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and the safety of the forward-viewing gastroscope compared with the side-viewing duodenoscope. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 75 Billroth II gastrectomy patients who underwent ERCP by the same experienced endoscopist. Procedures were performed using side-viewing duodenoscope in the first 41 patients and forward-viewing gastroscope in the subsequent 34 patients. The success and complication rates of ERCP were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Afferent loop intubation was achieved in 39 patients (95.1%) in the side-viewing duodenoscope group and in 34 patients (100%) in the forward-viewing gastroscope group (P = 0.49). The rates of reaching the papilla was 70.7% (n = 29) and 91.1% (n = 31), respectively (P = 0.06). Cannulation success rate after reaching the papilla was 100% in the side-viewing duodenoscope group and 90.3% in the forward-viewing gastroscope group. In the side-viewing duodenoscope group, 11 patients underwent sphincterotomy (EST), 14 patients underwent both EST and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD), and 4 patients underwent only EPBD. All but one patients in the forward-viewing gastroscope group underwent EPBD without EST. The technical and the clinical success rate did not statistically differ between the groups (70.7% vs. 82.3%, 68.3% vs. 79.4%, respectively). Adverse events included jejunal perforation in one patient (2.4%) in the side-viewing duodenoscope group, and pancreatitis in one patient (2.9%) in the forward-viewing gastroscope group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that forward-viewing gastroscope is as effective as side-viewing duodenoscope for ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Furthermore, EPBD without prior EST appears to be a safe and effective procedure in these patients.

Management of suspected common bile duct stone: diagnostic yield of current guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has recently published a guideline for suspected CBDS with the intention of reducing unnecessary ERCP and thereby complications. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the ASGE guideline. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent ERCP with suspected CBDS were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into high, intermediate and low risk groups based on predictors that have been suggested by the ASGE. Very strong predictors of the presence of ductal stones included: CBDS on transabdominal ultrasonography (US), clinical ascending cholangitis or total bilirubin (TBIL) >4 mg/dL). Strong predictors included dilated CBD >6 mm on US with gallbladder in situ and TBIL level of 1.8-4.0 mg/dL whereas moderate predictor included abnormal liver biochemical test other than bilirubin, age more than 55 years and clinical findings of biliary pancreatitis. RESULTS: Of 888 enrolled patients, 704 had CBDS demonstrated by ERCP and the remainder did not. All very strong and strong predictors were found to be significantly higher among patients who had CBDS. Detection of CBDS by ultrasonography and a dilated common biliary duct were observed to be independent risk factors associated with the existence of CBDS. The high risk group had a high (86.7%) positive predictive value (PPV), however, sensitivity and specificity were observed to be moderate (67.8% and 60.3% respectively). PPV was 67.9% in the intermediate risk group and the sensitivity and specificity were very low (31.9% and 42.3%). DISCUSSION: The probability of CBDS was observed to be high in the intermediate and high risk groups. However due to low sensitivity and specificity values, the ASGE guideline needs additional or different predictors.

Clinical and histological features of idiosyncratic liver injury: Dilemma in diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis.

AIM: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is becoming a worldwide problem with its still unexplained properties. METHODS: The data of patients who were diagnosed with DILI between January 2008 and December 2013 were assessed. RESULTS: Five patients had been diagnosed with intrinsic and 82 patients with idiosyncratic DILI. The most common causative agents were antimicrobial drugs. The most common injury pattern was hepatocellular. When patients with bilirubin levels of more than 5 mg/dL were divided into two groups according to receiving steroid therapy (n = 11) or not (n = 40), there was not any significant difference according to their clinical results (P > 0.05). Five of the idiosyncratic DILI patients were diagnosed with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH). In histopathological examination, hepatic rosette formation and emperipolesis were observed to be more common among patients with DI-AIH when compared with ones without (P < 0.05). Interestingly, in the remaining patients with DILI (n = 77), three of them were diagnosed with classic autoimmune hepatitis during long-term follow up (range, 11-51 months). CONCLUSION: The most common causes were antimicrobials, but any agents that have not been defined to cause DILI can induce DILI. The efficacy of steroids in DILI has not been observed but all deaths were observed in the steroid-free group. The association of DILI and AIH was observed in two different types in terms of diagnosis in our study. The first association was DI-AIH. The second one is the classical AIH which developed in three patients after a few months following spontaneous recovery of DILI.

Endoscopic treatment of patients with bile duct stricture after cholecystectomy: factors predicting recurrence in the long term.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic treatment is effective in the treatment of patients with bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. We aimed to investigate the long-term results of endoscopic treatment, factors predicting the recurrence of the stricture, and to determine the optimal endoscopic treatment. METHODS: The study was a retrospective cohort analysis and conducted at a tertiary referral center in patients with major bile duct injury (Strasberg E1-4 and E5 patients with main bile duct injury). Patients with minor injury (Luschka and cystic duct leakage), complete transection, and isolated aberrant bile duct injuries were excluded. RESULTS: The study group included 156 patients. The median follow-up period after stent removal was 6.5 years (range 1-16.5). Recurrence was seen in 18 patients (11 %) after a median duration of 9 months (range 2-96). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the most important factors predicting the success of endoscopic treatment were: Rome type of treatment (inserting increasing number of stents every 3-4 months) (odds ratio 23.8, 95 % CI 1.46-390.7, p = 0.026) instead of Amsterdam-type treatment (replacing two 10F biliary stents every 3-4 months) and dilation of the stricture diameter to at least 76 % of the common bile duct diameter at the end of stent treatment (odds ratio 25.9, 95 % CI 2.46-272.7, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment is an effective method in the treatment of patients with bile duct stricture after cholecystectomy. Inserting multiple stents as much as possible without leaving a scar in the bile ducts should be aimed.

Endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomotic leaks: A single tertiary center experience.

Anastomotic leakage in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses after esophagectomy/gastrectomy is a severe complication with a high mortality rate. We aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical success and outcomes of endoscopic placement of fully covered self-expanding metallic stents (FCSEMSs) for treating anastomotic leaks that develop after cancer surgery. All consecutive patients treated at the Gastroenterology Department, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, who underwent endoscopic FCSEMSs for leaks of esophagogastric or esophagojejunal anastomosis between February 2015 and December 2021 were included in the study. We analyzed the data on leak characteristics, technical success, clinical success, stent-related complications, and mortality to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopically implanted FCSEMSs. A total of 24 patients, 12 of whom were male were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 60 years (min-max: 38-84). Nineteen patients underwent esophagojejunal anastomosis, and 5 patients underwent esophagogastric anastomosis. The median stent follow-up time was 68.8 (26-190) days, and the median hospital stay was 62.7 (24-145) days. Complications related to stent placement were observed in of 50%. The most common complication was stent migration, occurring at a frequency of 37.5%. The median follow-up period time was 11.4 (2-37) months. While the clinical success rate was 87.5%, 3 patients died. Endoscopic placement of FCSEMSs is a relatively safe and beneficial treatment for esophagojejunal and esophagogastric anastomotic leaks.

Ectopic Opening of Common Bile Duct to Duodenal Bulb: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The ectopic opening of the common bile duct(CBD) into the duodenal bulb is a rare biliary anomaly. The study aimed to reveal the experience with clinical and endoscopic outcomes in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for ectopic opening of the CBD into the duodenal bulb at our institution between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (49 males). A total of 146 ERCP procedures were performed (once in 26 patients and 2 or more times in 31 patients). Ten patients had a history of unsuccessful ERCP in an external center. The median follow-up time was 14.6 months. All patients had a slit-like opening of the CBD into the duodenal bulb, apical stenosis, and hook-shaped distal CBD. ERCP findings were CBD stone or dilatation in 55 patients and post-cholecystectomy biliary leakage in 2 patients. Balloon dilatation was performed for apical stenosis in 7 patients and distal CBD stenosis in 26 patients. During the first ERCP session, biliary stent/nasobiliary drainage was placed in 37 patients, and CBD stones were extracted in 19 patients without stenting. Biliodigestive anastomosis was applied to 13 patients, 5 of whom had recurrent cholangitis, 7 required recurrent ERCP, and one was due to the technical difficulty of ERCP. CONCLUSIONS: Ectopic biliary opening should be remembered if the papilla cannot be seen in its usual place in a patient with apical stenosis. ERCP should be performed in experienced hands, and surgery should be considered in the need for recurrent ERCP.

Suprapapillary Needle Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Precut Sphincterotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important therapeutic tool for many biliary diseases. Selective biliary cannulation is the first step of the treatment process. Needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) and conventional precut sphincterotomy (CPS) are widely used in difficult biliary cannulation. However, there are different results in their effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to compare both methods regarding cannulation success and adverse event profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All eligible consecutive patients with naive papillae who underwent biliary ERCP by a single experienced endoscopist over a 3-year period were included retrospectively. The standard cannulation method with a guidewire-loaded sphincterotome was initially used for biliary cannulation in all patients. Cannulation was accepted as difficult in the case of failure of standard cannulation within 5 minutes or despite 5 attempts or insertion of the guidewire to the pancreatic duct 5 times. Three modalities in patients with difficult biliary cannulation were employed according to the structure and configuration of the papillae in addition to unintentional pancreatic cannulation: (1) NKF, (2) CPS, (3) Double guidewire technique or guidewire orientation/precut following pancreatic stenting. Latter was excluded to enable direct comparison between NKF and CPS groups. RESULTS: A total of 644 patients were recruited. Analyses were performed with 541 patients after the exclusion of 103 patients. Mean (SD) age was 60.4 (18.2) years, and 257 (47.5%) patients were male. While standard cannulation was successful in 366 (67.6%), difficult biliary cannulation was observed in 175 (32.4%) patients. NKF was performed in 101 (57.7%) patients, and cannulation success was 100% in the first ERCP session. In contrast, CPS was performed in 74 (42.3%) patients with a lower cannulation success rate (79.7%) than NKF ( P <0.001). Post-ERCP pancreatitis rate was higher in CPS (9.5%) than NKF group (3.0%, P =0.063). Bleeding and cholangitis were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with difficult biliary cannulation with appropriate papillary structure and configuration, NKF should be used as the first choice in experienced hands because of high biliary cannulation success and low Post-ERCP pancreatitis risk.

Similarities and Differences Between Gerontal and Young Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: Evaluation of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is an abrupt inflammatory disease of the exocrine pancreas and it can occur in different severities. It is becoming more common and more mortal in the gerontal population. The aim of our study was to explore the similarities and differences between young and gerontal patients with acute pancreatitis, with a special emphasis on patients over 80 years of age. METHODS: Medical records of patients (n = 1150) with acute pancreatitis were analyzed retrospectively. Several scoring systems including Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis, Ranson's score, Harmless acute pancreatitis score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Balthazar Grade, Glasgow score, and Japanese severity score were applied at admission. Patients were divided into 3 groups; group I, young group (n = 706), if they were aged <65 years; group II, older group (n = 338), if they were aged ≥65 years to <80 years; group III, octogenarian group (n = 106), if they were aged ≥ 0 years. RESULTS: In total, 1150 patients with acute pancreatitis were analyzed. Octogenarian group (n = 42, 39.6%) showed a more severe acute pancreatitis compared to patients in group I (n = 15, 2.1%) and II (n = 50, 14.8%, P < .001). Complications were more common in patients in group III (P < .001). Mortality rate was higher in patients in group III (n = 53, 50%) compared to group I (n = 8, 1.1%) and group II (n = 53, 15.7%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Gerontal patients with acute pancreatitis tend to have more severe disease and systemic and local complications. Mortality rates were higher in older patients compared to younger patients.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Treatment of Proximally Migrated Pancreatic Stents.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and treatment strategies of proximally migrated pancreatic stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 626 sessions of 421 patients with pancreatic duct stenting were retrospectively analyzed between 2010 and 2018, and patients with proximally migrated stents were included in the study. RESULTS: Of 626 stents examined, 77 migrated proximally (12%). The migration rate (MR) was 16%, 2%, and 7%, respectively, in patients treated with chronic pancreatitis, malignancy, and pancreatic leakage indication. The MR was 14% in procedures with pancreatic duct stenosis, 21% in procedures with pancreatic sphincterotomy, and 27% in procedures performed from minor papillae. The MR of the 5, 7, and 10 Fr stents was 4%, 17%, and 10%, respectively. Of the 77 migrated stents, 64 were successfully removed (83%). This success rate (SR) was 84% in procedures with chronic pancreatitis indication, 83% in procedures with pancreatic duct stenosis, 79% in procedures with sphincterotomy, and 75% in procedures performed from minor papillae. The SR of the 5, 7, and 10 Fr stents was 100%, 79%, and 92%, respectively. It was also determined that 33 stents were fractured and migrated (43%). The SR of the fractured stents was 76%. Moreover, of the stents that were successfully removed, 35 were removed with forceps (55%) and 15 (23%) were removed with a balloon. Furthermore, in 47 cases, the stent was removed in the first session (73%). Acute pancreatitis occurred in 5 patients (8%) and perforation occurred in 1 patient (2%). CONCLUSION: In this study, it was shown that proximal migration of pancreatic stents is frequent and most of these stents can be removed successfully.