RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study is to present our institutional experience during the management of anesthesia in lung transplantation (LT) surgeries as a definitive surgical treatment option in end-stage lung diseases. METHODS: From a total of 15 patients, lung transplantation was performed as single LT (SLT) in 4 patients (n = 4) and as sequential bilateral LT (BLT) in 11 patients (n = 11). The anesthetic management included; for induction; intravenous ketamine, midazolam at doses of 2 mg/kg, 0.05 mg/kg, respectively or propofol, fentanyl at doses of 1 mg/kg, 3 mcg/kg, respectively. For maintenance, all patients received; 100% O2 and total intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil at doses of 0.02 mcg/kg/min and 0.1-0.25 µg/kg/min, respectively. All patients received intravenous rocuronium bromide for induction and maintenance. Hemodynamic stability was maintained with appropriate and adequate administration of vasodilators (intravenous Prostaglandin (PGI2) (0.5-1 ng/kg/min), inhaled nitric oxide (10-40 ppm), dopamine (2 mcg/kg/min) and vasopressors (intravenous dobutamine (5-15 mcg/kg/min), norepinephrine (0.05-1 mcg/kg/min),ephedrine (5 to 10 mg bolus doses ) to keep mean arterial blood pressure above 50 mmHg. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was performed in five patients who underwent sequential BLT and one SLT case. Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used in four cases of sequential BLT and in two cases of SLT. Neither ECMO nor CPB was performed in two BLT and in one SLT patient. One SLT patient who underwent CPB was admitted to the intensive care unit with support of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and ECMO. Intraoperative death did not occur. CONCLUSION: During SLT or BLT, management of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil provides a stable hemodynamic and medical support. Although our experience with VA ECMO was limited, our experience shows that this support system is a valuable tool to provide hemodynamic stability for patients undergoing LT.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Remifentanilo , TurquíaRESUMEN
Introduction. Increased levels of stress hormones are associated with mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Aim. To compare total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and desflurane added to a subanaesthetic dose of propofol. Material and Methods. Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Fentanyl (3-5 mcg/kg/h) was started in both groups. Patients were divided into two groups. The PD group (n = 25) received 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane anaesthesia in addition to propofol infusion (2-3 mg/kg/h), while P group (n = 25) received propofol infusion (5-6 mg/kg/h) only. Biochemical data, cortisol, and insulin levels were measured preoperatively (T0), after initiation of CPB but before cross-clamping the aorta (T1), after removal of the cross-clamp (T2), and at the 24th postoperative hour (T3). Results. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure levels were significantly higher in PD group than those in P group in T1 and T2 measurements (p ≤ 0.05). CK-MB showed a significant decrease in group P (p ≤ 0.05). When we compared both groups, cortisol levels were significantly higher in PD group than P group (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion. Stress and haemodynamic responses were better controlled using TIVA than desflurane inhalation added to a subanaesthetic dose of propofol in patients undergoing CABG.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Intravenosa , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Isoflurano/análogos & derivados , Propofol/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Aorta/efectos de los fármacos , Biomarcadores , Índice de Masa Corporal , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Desflurano , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Hemodinámica , Hormonas/sangre , Humanos , Isoflurano/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirugía , Propofol/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of combined epidural analgesia with total intravenous anaesthesia and only total intravenous anaesthesia on the different clinical parameters. METHODS: Sixty high risk patients undergoing a major abdominal surgical procedure were included in this prospective, double blind, randomized study. Induction of anaesthesia was performed with IV remifentanil 0.5µg/kg and propofol titrated to achieve bispectral index score between 40 and 50. after intubation; in Group E, 0.1% bupivacaine and 2 µg/mL fentanyl were administered by an infusion rate at 0.15 ml/kg/h via the epidural catheter and Group C received epidural normal saline as same infusion rate. RESULTS: In group E, intraoperative MAP values were significantly lower than those in group C (p<0.05). Time of extubation, time of eye opening with audible warning and time of verbal response was significantly lower in group E than those in group C. Total anaesthetic drug consumption was significantly higher in group C than those in group E (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on lower requirements for propofol and remifentanil as well as the favourable effects on clinical parameters; we conclude that bispectral index score guided combined epidural with total intravenous anaesthesia is superior to solely total intravenous anaesthesia in this type of surgery.