Mechanical traction from different knee joint angles in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of mechanical traction from different knee angles on pain, physical function, and range of motion in patients with knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient public and governmental Hospital clinics. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned into 4 equal groups with 30 patients in each group. INTERVENTIONS: Group (A) received conventional physiotherapy(CPT) treatment; group (B) received CPT with knee traction from full extension, group (C) received CPT with knee traction from 90° flexion, while group (D) received CPT with knee traction from 20° flexion. Interventions were applied 3 sessions a week for 4 weeks. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Visual analog scale (VAS), knee passive range of motion and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were measured at baseline, immediately after 4 weeks of intervention, and after 4 weeks of no intervention as a follow-up. RESULTS: After eight weeks, the mean (SD) for VAS scores were 30.97 ± 8.68, 24.0 ± 8.8, 15.43 ± 6.31, and 16.17 ± 6.11 mm; for total WOMAC scores were 26.77 ± 9.19, 20.3 ± 8.52, 13.27 ± 6.25, and 13.43 ± 7.14 for groups A, B, C and D, respectively. The three traction groups showed statistically significant changes in pain scores, physical function, and total WOMAC, but not for knee passive range of motion, in favor of traction groups C and D than the conventional group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Traction from 90°and 20° of knee flexion was found superior to full extension knee in improving pain and physical function, but not for knee passive range of motion, in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Effect of Adding Neural Mobilization Versus Myofascial Release to Stabilization Exercises after Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To test the effect of adding neural mobilization (NM) versus myofascial release (MFR) to stabilization exercises (SE) on disability, pain, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) in patients with lumbar spine fusion (LSF). DESIGN: A single blinded, parallel groups, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient public and governmental hospital clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=60) who had undergone LSF were randomly assigned into 3 equal groups. INTERVENTION: Group I received NM plus SE, group II received MFR and SE, and group III received SE only. Each group visited the hospital 3 times a week for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale, and back range of motion (BROM) were assessed before starting treatment, immediately after finishing treatment, and 1 month later. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences among the groups regarding the ODI and pain (P<.05) in favor of the study groups, but no statistically significant differences were found among groups regarding the BROM outcome (P>.05). Regarding the within-group effect, statistically significant differences were found in all outcomes after 1 month of treatment, as well as after 1 month of follow-up in each group (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received NM or MFR combined with SE demonstrated better improvement, in favor of the NM group, regarding disability and pain than patients who received SE alone after LSF. No differences were found among the groups regarding lumbar ROM.

Efficacy of whole-body vibration on balance control, postural stability, and mobility after thermal burn injuries: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the additive effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) training to the traditional physical therapy program (TPTP) on balance control, postural stability, and mobility after thermal burn injuries. DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized controlled study. SETTING: Outpatient physical therapy setting. PARTICIPANTS: Forty participants, 20-45 years old, with deep second-degree thermal burn involving the lower limbs and trunk, with 35%-40% total body service area, were randomly allocated either into the study group or the control group. INTERVENTION: The study group received WBV plus TPTP while the control group received the TPTP only. Interventions were applied three sessions a week for eight weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Anteroposterior stability index (APSI), mediolateral stability index (MLSI), overall stability index (OSI), timed-up and go (TUG), and Berg balance scale (BBS) were measured at baseline and after eight weeks of interventions. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in APSI, MLSI, OSI, BBS, and TUG in favor of the WBV group after eight weeks of intervention (P < 0.001). After eight weeks of intervention, the mean (SD) for APSI, MLSI, OSI, BBS, and TUG scores were 1.87 ± 0.51, 41.36 ± 0.18, 1.95 ± 0.56, 47.2 ± 6.12, and 8.15 ± 1.05 seconds in the WBV group, and 2.41 ± 0.71, 2.21 ± 0.54, 2.68 ± 0.73, 40.65 ± 4.7, and 10.95 ± 2.44 seconds in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The whole-body vibration training combined with the TPTP was more beneficial in improving APS, MLS, OSI, TUG, and BBS than TPTP alone. It might be considered a useful adjunctive therapy in treating patients with healed wounds with a deep second-degree burn of the trunk and lower limbs.

Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy on arthropathy of the hands in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on arthropathy of the hands in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. DESIGN: A double-blinded randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients, 30-50-years-old, suffering from arthropathy of the hands were randomly assigned either into the experimental group, received HILT plus the routine physical therapy program or the control group, received sham HILT plus the same routine physical therapy program. INTERVENTION: All treatment interventions were applied at a frequency of three sessions per week for eight weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Handgrip strength, joints swelling counts, joints tenderness counts, visual analog scale (VAS) were measured before and after eight-weeks of interventions. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in handgrip strength, joint swelling count, joint tenderness count and VAS in favor of the study group (P < 0.05). After eight-weeks of intervention, the mean (SD) for handgrip strength, joint swelling counts, joint tenderness count, and pain score was 28.34 ± 8.3 kg, 4.4 ± 2.18, 5 ± 2.1, and 35.6 ± 13.87 mm in the study group, and 22.96 ± 8.76 kg, 7.36 ± 2.14, 9.08 ± 1.63, and 58.8 ± 10.54 mm in the control group, respectively. The MD (95%CI) for handgrip strength, joint swelling counts, joint tenderness count, and pain score was 5.38(0.53,10.23) kg, -2.96(-4.19, -1.73), -4.08(-5.15, -3.01), and -23.2(-30.2, -16.2) mm between groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adding HILT to the routine physical therapy program might be more effective than routine physical therapy program alone in improving handgrip strength, decreasing joint swelling counts, joint tenderness counts, and pain in patients with arthropathy of the hands.

Effects of kinesiotaping and exercise program on patients with obesity-induced coccydynia: a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of kinesiotaping and a designed exercise program versus sham kinesiotaping and the same exercise program on pain, range of motion, and activities of daily living in obese patients suffering from coccydynia. DESIGN: A double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient, Cairo University hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients with coccydynia randomized equally into kinesiotape plus exercise and sham kinesiotape plus exercise groups. INTERVENTION: The kinesiotape was worn for three days and replaced for three weeks. Each patient practiced exercises for three weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients were examined by visual analogue scale (VAS) for rating pain, Modified Modified Schober Test (MMST), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). All outcomes were measured at baseline, three weeks postintervention, and four weeks follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups at baseline (P < 0.05), but there were statistically significant differences between groups for pain score, MMST, and ODI at post and follow-up data in favor of the kinesiotape group (P < 0.001). For the three weeks postintervention, mean (SD) for pain score, MMST, and ODI was 33.07 ± 3.8, 6.6 ± 0.7, and 8.7 ± 2.1 in the study group and 39.9 ± 4.7, 5.8 ± 1.4, and 14.4 ± 2.7 in the control group, respectively. For the four weeks follow-up, mean (SD) for pain score, MMST, and ODI was 32.2 ± 3.4, 7.13 ± 0.6, and 7.2 ± 1.8 in the study group and 40.9 ± 4.4, 6.6 ± 0.75, and 13 ± 2 in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Experimental kinesiotape intervention and exercise program provided significant improvements in pain, range of motion, and disability. It is suggested as an adjunctive therapy in treating obese patients with coccydynia.

Adding Weight Shift Training to Weight Reduction Decreases the Risk of Falling in Obese Women: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of adding weight shift training to a weight loss program on the risk of falling, fear of falling, overall stability, anteroposterior stability, mediolateral stability, and isometric knee torque in young obese women. DESIGN: A single-blinded, randomized controlled study was performed. Sixty women, 18 to 46 yrs old, were randomly assigned either to the study or the control group. The participants in the study group were given weight-shifting training plus a weight reduction program; the control group received only a weight-reduction program. The interventions were performed for 12 wks. At baseline and after 12 wks of training, the risk of falling, fear of falling, overall stability, anteroposterior stability, mediolateral stability, and isometric knee torque were all examined. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in risk of falling, fear of falling, isometric knee torque, and overall, anteroposterior, and mediolateral stability indices, in favor of the study group, after 3 mos of training ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Weight shift training combined with weight reduction was more beneficial than weight reduction alone in decreasing the risk of falling and fear of falling and improving isometric knee torque and overall, anteroposterior, and mediolateral stability indices. It could be used for treating balance problems and weakness around the knee joint in obese women. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the impact of weight shift training on risk of falling and postural stability in obese women; (2) Identify the effect of weight shift training on fear of falling in adult women with obesity; and (3) Verify the additive effect of weight shift training to weight reduction program vs. weight reduction program alone on muscle strength in young obese women. LEVEL: Advanced. ACCREDITATION: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Bournemouth questionnaire Arabic version: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability for patients with low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To translate, culturally adapt, validate, and investigate the reliability of Arabic version of Bournemouth questionnaire (BQ) for patients with low back pain. METHOD: Thirty experts (three panels) and 70 low back pain patients (37.5 ± 13.9 years) were involved in this study. Test-retest as well as internal consistency analyses were used to assess reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) was used to assess test-retest analysis, whereas Cronbach alpha value was calculated to assess the internal consistency. BQ Arabic version validity was evaluated in forms of face, content, internal, and external construct validity. Internal construct validity was evaluated with factor analysis, and external construct validity was tested by the correlation between the Arabic version of BQ and short-form (36) health survey (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed that BQ had a single factor. BQ has a very good correlation with SF-36 questionnaire (r = .74). Arabic version of BQ has a high internal consistency reliability where Cronbach alpha value was 0.889 at baseline and 0.911 after 1 week. The test-retest analysis was between 0.87 and 0.96 and for the BQ total score was 0.95 (p < .0001) indicating that test-retest results are highly correlated. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of BQ is a valid, reliable, and feasible scale for assessment of low back patients. It is short, easy-to-apply, need short time to complete and comprehensive scale. So it may be considered as a preferable scale for clinical assessment of Arabic speaking patients with low back pain.