RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is a genetic condition caused by pathogenic variants in the FLCN gene resulting in benign skin lesions, spontaneous pneumothorax, and increased risk for a variety of renal tumors. Skin manifestations of BHD include trichodiscoma (TD) and fibrofolliculoma (FF), which may represent the same pathologic entity. These lesions can identify BHD patients, who upon positive genetic testing can be considered for life-long surveillance for renal neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients diagnosed with TD and FF including rates and outcomes of genetics referral. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews of patients with confirmed or possible diagnosis of TD or FF at the University of Michigan from September 2002 through October 2020 to assess pathologic findings, personal and family history of BHD manifestations, referral for genetic evaluation, and genetic testing results. RESULTS: 64 patients had a pathologic diagnosis of TD or FF, 16 of whom (25%) were referred to cancer genetics. Fourteen patients completed genetic evaluation, 9 of whom were diagnosed with BHD (64%), with 6 unique pathogenic variants in FLCN. CONCLUSION: Providers should consider referral for genetic evaluation for patients with biopsy-proven TD or FF, as early diagnosis of BHD provides the opportunity for early detection and treatment of other BHD-associated conditions.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Birt-Hogg-Dubé , Pruebas Genéticas , Derivación y Consulta , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor , Humanos , Síndrome de Birt-Hogg-Dubé/genética , Síndrome de Birt-Hogg-Dubé/complicaciones , Síndrome de Birt-Hogg-Dubé/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/genética , Anciano , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A subset of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases occur because of a hereditary predisposition. However, the prevalence and profiling of germline alterations in RCC have not been fully characterized. Additionally, clinicopathologic factors associated with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in patients with RCC remain poorly understood. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with RCC who underwent genetic evaluation was performed. The frequency of P/LP germline variants and genes was evaluated in this cohort. The association between genetic testing outcomes and clinicopathologic features was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients with RCC who had germline testing were identified. Within this cohort, 42 patients (13.1%) had P/LP variants. Genes with the most frequent germline mutations were FLCN (n = 10, 3.1%), SDHB (n = 4, 1.2%), VHL (n = 4, 1.2%), MLH1 (n = 3, 0.9%), and CHEK2 (n = 4, 1.2%). Among patients with P/LP variants, 19 (45.2%) had a potentially targetable mutation. The presence of bilateral or multifocal tumors was associated with P/LP variants (P = .0012 and P = .0098, respectively). Patients who had targeted gene testing had higher rates of P/LP variants compared with multigene panel testing (P = .015). Age and family history of cancers (RCC and non-RCC) did not have any statistically significant association with germline testing outcomes. CONCLUSION: Among patients with RCC, unselected for a known familial predisposition, 13.4% had P/LP variants. Almost half of patients with P/LP variants had a potentially targetable mutation. Targeted gene panel testing is a feasible option for patients, particularly if syndromic features are present. Age and family history were not associated with P/LP variants. Future studies are needed to optimize current genetic evaluation criteria to expand the detection of patients with RCC who may have germline mutations.