Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 2035-2040, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37142888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (rsRARP) has gained popularity due to superior early continence outcomes compared to standard robotic prostatectomy (sRARP). We evaluate the results of a single surgeon who transitioned from sRARP to rsRARP and compare oncologic and functional outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all prostatectomies performed by a single surgeon between June 2018 and October 2020. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Patients who underwent sRARP were compared with those who underwent rsRARP. RESULTS: Both groups contained 37 consecutive patients each. Preoperative patient characteristics and biopsy results were similar between the two groups. Perioperative outcomes were significant for longer operative room time and higher proportion of T3 tumors in the rsRARP group. Thirty-day complication and readmission rates were similar between groups. There was no difference in early oncologic outcomes, including positive surgical margin rate, biochemical recurrence, and need for adjuvant or salvage treatments. The time to urinary continence and immediate continence rate was superior in the rsRARP group. CONCLUSIONS: The Retzius-sparing approach can be safely adopted by surgeons experienced in sRARP without compromising early oncologic outcomes and with the benefit of improved early continence recovery.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Incontinencia Urinaria , Masculino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/prevención & control , Prostatectomía/métodos
2.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 53(4): 679-683, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33206338

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase the risk of kidney stone formation, but the mechanism has not been elucidated. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the effects of PPIs on urinary metabolites and urine pH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of nephrolithiasis patients treated at our institution and compared patients who were taking PPIs to those who were not at the time of their 24-h urine collections. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between PPI use and urinary mineral composition. RESULTS: We identified 301 consecutive patients, 88 (29%) of whom were taking PPIs at the time of their 24-h urine collections. Patients taking PPIs were older and more likely to have medical comorbidities associated with metabolic syndrome such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia (p < 0.01). Controlling for these factors, patients taking PPIs were found to have 12% lower 24-h urine citrate excretion (ß = - 0.12, ΔF = 4.24, p = 0.04). There were no other differences in urinary mineral composition between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that patients who take PPIs regularly may be at risk for decreased urinary citrate excretion. The consequent decrease in urinary citrate may become clinically significant for patients with other predisposing factors for hypocitraturia.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Cítrico/orina , Nefrolitiasis/orina , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Adulto , Anciano , Ácido Cítrico/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrolitiasis/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA