RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend measuring natriuretic peptide biomarkers to establish prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We assessed whether a combination biomarkers approach improve prognostication in patients with stable HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational cohort study recruited 202 patients with stable HFrEF at a single center, tertiary care hospital undergoing elective cardiac resynchronization therapy device placement from 2013 to 2015. Twenty-four biomarkers were analyzed individually and in combination using Cox proportion hazard regression model for major adverse cardiac events (ie, death, cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device placement), and major adverse cardiac events plus HF hospitalizations. The single best biomarker for predicting major adverse cardiac events is peripheral mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (C statisticâ¯=â¯0.771 ± 0.045) compared to current guideline recommended N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (C=0.668 ± 0.046). The best combined biomarkers for predicting major adverse cardiac events are blood urea nitrogen, coronary sinus C-reactive protein, peripheral mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and peripheral soluble IL-1 receptor-like 1 (Câ¯=â¯0.767 ± 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort, the combined biomarkers (blood urea nitrogen, C-reactive protein, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and soluble IL-1 receptor-like 1) or the single biomarker (mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin) was superior to N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, the current guideline recommended biomarker in predicting cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and examine whether single or combined biomarkers improve HFrEF prognostication.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Biomarcadores , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico , Fragmentos de Péptidos , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Volumen SistólicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ventricular ablation may be clinically indicated for patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and has been shown to decrease risk of recurrence and overall morbidity. However, the existence of disparities among patients receiving ventricular ablation has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors examined patients hospitalized with VT to determine whether disparities exist among those receiving ablations. METHODS: The authors used the National Inpatient Sample to assess patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of VT in 2019 who did and did not receive catheter ablations. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate risk factors for VT ablation based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, female and Black patients hospitalized with VT had significantly lower odds of receiving ablations compared with male and White patients (OR: 0.835; 95% CI: 0.699-0.997; P = 0.047; and OR: 0.617; 95% CI: 0.457-0.832; P = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, patients at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive ablations compared with those at urban, teaching hospitals. No significant differences were noted based on income or insurance status in the adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: The authors identified significant disparities in the delivery of ventricular ablations among patients hospitalized with VT. Overall, patients who were female or Black as well as those who were hospitalized at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive VT ablations during hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirugía , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Riesgo , AdultoRESUMEN
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is effective in patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35%, and a widened QRS complex. LBBP leads to iatrogenic incomplete right bundle branch block (iRBBB). Bi-bundle pacing can resolve iRBBB, further narrowing the QRS duration, and may improve LVEF. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).