The High Incidence of Occult Carcinoma in Total Hepatectomy Specimens of Patients Treated for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases With Liver Transplant.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate of occult carcinoma deposits in total hepatectomy specimens from patients treated with liver transplant (LT) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that patients with CRLM treated with systemic therapy demonstrate a high rate of complete radiographic response or may have disappearing liver metastases. However, this does not necessarily translate into a complete pathologic response, and residual invasive cancer may be found in up to 80% of the disappearing tumors after resection. METHODS: Retrospective review of 14 patients who underwent LT for CRLM, at 2 centers. Radiographic and pathologic correlation of the number of tumors and their viability before and after LT was performed. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) number of tumors at diagnosis was 11 (4-23). The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 24 (16-37). Hepatic artery infusion was used in 5 patients (35.7%); 6 (42.9%) underwent surgical resection, and 5 (35.7%) received locoregional therapy. The indication for LT was unresectability in 8 patients (57.1%) and liver failure secondary to oncologic treatment in the remaining 6 (42.9%). Before LT, 7 patients (50%) demonstrated fluorodeoxyglucose-avid tumors and 7 (50%) had a complete radiographic response. Histopathologically, 11 patients (78.6%) had a viable tumor. Nine (64.2%) of the 14 patients were found to have undiagnosed metastases on explant pathology, with at least 22 unaccounted viable tumors before LT. Furthermore, 4 (57.1%) of the 7 patients who demonstrated complete radiographic response harbored viable carcinoma on explant pathology. CONCLUSIONS: A complete radiographic response does not reliably predict a complete pathologic response. In patients with unresectable CRLM, total hepatectomy and LT represent a promising treatment options to prevent indolent disease progression from disappearing CRLM.

Estimating the effect of increasing utilization of living donor liver transplantation using observational data.

There has been a recent increase in enthusiasm for expansion of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) programmes. Using all adults initially placed on the waiting list in the United States, we estimated the risk of overall mortality under national strategies which differed in their utilization of LDLT. We used a generalization of inverse probability weighting which can estimate the effect of interventions in the setting of finite resources. From 2005 to 2015, 93 812 eligible individuals were added to the waitlist: 51 322 received deceased donor grafts while 1970 underwent LDLT. Individuals who underwent LDLT had more favourable prognostic factors, including lower mean MELD score at transplant (14.6 vs. 20.5). The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of death under the current level of LDLT utilization were 18.0% (95% CI: 17.8, 18.3%), 41.2% (95% CI: 40.8, 41.5%) and 57.4% (95% CI: 56.9, 57.9%) compared to 17.9% (95% CI: 17.7, 18.2%), 40.6% (95% CI: 40.2, 40.9%) and 56.4% (95% CI: 55.8, 56.9%) under a strategy which doubles LDLT utilization. Expansion of LDLT utilization would have a measurable, modest effect on the risk of mortality for the entire cohort of individuals who begin on the transplant waiting list.

The Effect of the Opioid Epidemic on Donation After Circulatory Death Transplantation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic and the deaths of otherwise healthy individuals due to drug overdose in the United States has major implications for transplantation. The current extent and safety of utilization of liver and kidney grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors who died from opioid overdose is unknown. METHODS: Using national data from 2006 to 2016, we estimated the cumulative incidence of graft failure for recipients of DCD grafts, comparing the risk among recipients of organs from donors who died of anoxic drug overdose and recipients of organs from donors who died of other causes. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine (6.2%) of 2908 liver graft recipients and 944 (6.1%) of 15520 kidney graft recipients received grafts from donors who died of anoxic drug overdose. Grafts from anoxic drug overdose donors were less frequently used compared with other DCD grafts (liver, 25.9% versus 29.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference, -6.7% to -0.7%; kidney, 81.0% versus 84.7%; 95% CI for difference, -7.3% to -0.1%). However, the risk of graft failure at 5 years was similar for recipients of anoxic drug overdose donor grafts and recipients of other grafts (liver risk difference, 1.8%; 95% CI, -7.8% to 11.8%; kidney risk difference, -1.5%; 95% CI, -5.4% to 3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the current opioid epidemic, utilization of anoxic drug overdose DCD donor grafts does not increase the risk of graft failure and may help to address waitlist demands.