Evaluation of Global Dystonia Rating Scale as a predictor of unfavorable outcomes among acute antipsychotics poisoned patients.

Worldwide, acute antipsychotic poisoning results in high morbidities and mortalities. Though extrapyramidal syndromes are commonly associated, the extent of extrapyramidal syndromes in relation to the severity of antipsychotic poisoning has not been addressed yet. Thus, this study aimed to assess the Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) as an unfavorable outcomes predictive tool in acute antipsychotic poisoning. A cross-sectional study included 506 antipsychotic-poisoned patients admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center, Egypt, over three years was conducted. The mean GDRS was 9.1 ± 16.7 in typical antipsychotic poisoning, which was significantly higher than that of atypical antipsychotics (4.2 ± 11.5) (p = 0.003). Patients with GDRS> 20 showed significantly higher liability for all adverse outcomes (p < 0.05). However, poisoning with typical antipsychotics was associated with significantly more cardiotoxicity (p = 0.042), particularly prolonged QRS (p = 0.005), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.000). In contrary to the PSS, which failed to predict the studied adverse outcomes, GDRS significantly predicted all adverse outcomes (p < 0.000) for all antipsychotic generations. In atypical antipsychotics, GDRS above three accurately predicted cardiotoxicities, prolonged QTc interval, and respiratory failure with Area under curves (AUC) of 0.937, 0.963, and 0.941, respectively. In typical antipsychotic poisoning, at higher cutoffs (7.5, 27.5, 18, and 7.5), cardiotoxicities, prolonged QTc interval, and respiratory failure were accurately predicted (AUC were 0.974, 0.961, and 0.960, respectively). GDRS is an objective, substantially useful tool that quantifies dystonia and can be used as an early reliable predictor of potential toxicity in acute antipsychotic poisoning.

Postoperative Patient Pain Severity and Its Association With Anxiety, Depression, and Sleep Quality.

Introduction The experience of pain is a complex phenomenon. A patient in the acute postsurgical pain setting may feel a constant bombardment of nociceptive input from the surgical site; this in turn influences psychological factors that determine the overall emotional experience of pain, which is significant. The aim of our study was to investigate the severity of pain in postsurgical patients three days after surgery using the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Methods This was a cross-sectional assessment of postoperative pain. Participants were patients between 18 and 64 years of age who had undergone a surgical procedure (laparoscopic or open surgery), three days prior to the data collection and who were admitted or discharged postoperatively at the Al Salmaniya Complex, Manama, Bahrain. Participants were asked demographic questions about whether they had laparoscopic or open surgeries and completed self-reporting scales. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was utilized to screen for both the presence and severity of depression; Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) was administered to screen for anxiety; the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was used to evaluate insomnia; and the VAS was used to evaluate pain.  Results Sixty-seven patients were recruited, with a mean age of 61.53 years (SD = 7.37). Twenty-nine (43%) were females, 38 (57%) were males, 36 (54%) underwent elective surgery, 31 (46%) underwent emergency surgery, 31 (46%) underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 36 (54%) underwent open surgery. The average score on the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPISF) was 8.12 (SD = 1.16), indicating a moderate level of pain. Twenty-six (43%) patients had moderate-severe insomnia, 21 participants (31%) had no insomnia, 17 participants (25%) had subthreshold insomnia, 28 (42%) had moderate depression, five (7%) had moderate-severe depression, and 34 (51%) had severe depression. Eighteen participants (27%) had mild anxiety, 46 (69%) had moderate anxiety, and 3 (4%) had severe anxiety. Six of the participants (9%) reported moderate pain, while 61 participants (91%) reported severe pain.