Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Med Virol ; 92(7): 915-918, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270515

RESUMEN

An 80-year-old man with multiple comorbidities presented to the emergency department with tachypnea, tachycardia, fever, and critically low O2 saturation and definitive chest computerized tomography scan findings in favor of COVID-19 and positive PCR results in 48 hours. He received antiviral treatment plus recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) due to his severe anemia. After 7 days of treatment, he was discharged with miraculous improvement in his symptoms and hemoglobin level. We concluded that rhEPO could attenuate respiratory distress syndrome and confront the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus through multiple mechanisms including cytokine modulation, antiapoptotic effects, leukocyte release from bone marrow, and iron redistribution away from the intracellular virus.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquipnea/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/complicaciones , Anemia/diagnóstico , Anemia/virología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Biomarcadores/sangre , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Convalecencia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Enfermedad Crítica , Fiebre/complicaciones , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Fiebre/virología , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/virología , ARN Viral/sangre , ARN Viral/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2 , Taquicardia/complicaciones , Taquicardia/diagnóstico , Taquicardia/virología , Taquipnea/complicaciones , Taquipnea/diagnóstico , Taquipnea/virología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Daru ; 31(2): 145-153, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37540331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, two-drug antiretroviral regimens are emerging fields in life-long treatment in people living with HIV. OBJECTIVES: This randomized non-inferiority open-label controlled trial was designed to compare the 48-week efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir versus the standard triple therapy in virologically suppressed people living with HIV. To the best of our knowledge this combination has not been studied before. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in treatment-experienced people with HIV who had HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL for at least two years. Patients received either tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir combination (26 patients) or a standard three-drug regimen (29 patients). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL during 48 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were CD4 cell count changes, the adherence rate, and adverse drug reactions, all over 48 weeks of study. RESULTS: HIV viral load remained undetectable (HIV-RNA < 47 copies/mL) during the 48 weeks of the study in both arms. The absolute CD4 cell count change was not significant between the two groups. The overall proportion of adverse effects in each group was comparable. The rate of adherence to treatment was acceptable in both groups, and no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment simplification with tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir regimen as maintenance therapy was non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety compared to the standard triple therapy. Comparing efficacy of antiretroviral therapy.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Tenofovir/efectos adversos , Emtricitabina/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenina , Quimioterapia Combinada , ARN/uso terapéutico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos
3.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 61(5): 581-590, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217030

RESUMEN

Although people living with human immunodeficiency virus and other comorbidities are expected to experience more grievous consequences with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), recent cohort studies did not indicate this. Antiretrovirals (ARVs) might have a prophylactic role in these patients. The purpose of this study was to review the most recently published articles on the possible role of ARVs for pre- or postexposure prophylaxis against COVID-19. From June to October 2020, we searched scientific databases using specific key words to identify ongoing trials or articles published before October 2020 investigating any subgroups of ARVs for prophylaxis against COVID-19. Apart from molecular docking studies, in vitro, animal, and human studies are very limited for evaluating the prophylactic role of ARVs against severe acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. According to our findings, there is no definite evidence to support use of protease inhibitors for this purpose, despite the promising results of molecular studies and limited clinical evidence for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, darunavir, and nelfinavir when used early in the course of the disease. Nucleotide/nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) also have shown binding affinity to main enzymes of SARS-CoV-2 in molecular, in vitro, and animal studies. NRTIs like tenofovir and emtricitabine might exhibit a prophylactic role against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In conclusion, currently there is no evidence to justify the use of ARVs for prophylaxis against COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Animales , COVID-19/virología , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Profilaxis Posexposición , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA