Erythropoietin pharmacology.

Anaemia is a frequent complication in cancer patients and may be multifactorial in origin. Treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is an alternative to red blood cell transfusion. The evidence from clinical trials has established that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia with a haemoglobin concentration below 10 g/dl benefit from epoetin therapy. The native glycoprotein hormone consists of 165 amino acids with three N-glycosylation and one O-glycosylation sites. Epoetin and darbepoetin bind to the EPO receptor to induce intracellular signalling by the same intracellular molecules as native EPO. There are some differences in the glycosylation pattern which lead to variations in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic studies have examined the use of rHuEPO administered intravenously and subcutaneously and there is accumulating evidence that the latter route has several advantages in cancer patients. After subcutaneous administration, the bioavailability of epoetin is about 20-30% and has a plasma half-life of >24 h. Darbepoetin has a longer half-life after subcutaneous administration of 48 h. The general recommendations are based on evidence from trials in which epoetin was administered 150 U/kg thrice weekly. The recommended initial dose for darbepoetin alpha is 2.25 mug/kg per week. The most serious adverse effects are hypertension, bleeding and increased risk of thrombotic complications. Caution is advised when used in patients who are at high risk for thromboembolic events. In the management of anaemic cancer patients, physicians should closely follow the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines.

[Physiopathologic knowledge and clinical practice. A case of high dose chemotherapy in breast cancer]. / Conocimiento fisiopatológico y práctica clínica: quimioterapia a altas dosis en el cáncer de mama.

Breast cancer is the major cause of death from cancer in women. This causes a great activity in oncological investigation in this field. During the 80s preclinical data and retrospective analysis suggested a dose-response relationship both for adjuvant treatment and metastatic disease. Technical advances in collection and administration of peripheral stem cells and the development of hematological growth factors permitted the use, in this and other diseases, of high dose chemotherapy, usually with hematological support. All these things produced the widespread use of this technique with the only scientific support of phase II studies usually performed in only one center and with highly selected patients. Most of the randomized trials performed afterwards did not show a clinically important relationship between dose and response. This makes us think that this technique should not be used as routinary treatment. From a methodological point of view it would be interesting to investigate the evolution of this modality of treatment and why, its use has been so generalized without good quality scientifically support. This could be due to predetermined ideas in relation to what is the evolution and treatment of this disease, the neglect in the use of scientific methodology and the pressures coming from different directions trying to adopt new (and presumably better, treatments). It is evident that if most of the patients who have received high dose treatment for breast cancer had participated in randomized trials the question would probably have already been answered.

Initialization of adjuvant hormonal treatment for breast cancer.

The introduction of aromatase inhibitors (AI) has resulted in practice change approaches in the treatment of early breast cancer. In this paper, we analyze the most relevant studies including the ATAC, BIG 1-98, TEAM, MA-17, NSABP B-33, and ABSCG-6 studies. Postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer should be treated with AI for 5 years. For patients who have been initiated with tamoxifen (TAM), switching to an AI to complete 5 years of treatment is also recommended. The results of the extended adjuvant therapy studies recommend the use of an AI (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane) after the completion of standard TAM treatment. With regards to premenopausal women, TAM is the recommended adjuvant hormonal treatment for pre- and perimenopausal women. There is no indication for the use of AI in these subgroups of patients. Finally, determination of CYP 2D6 polymorphisms could be considered when choosing the best adjuvant hormonal treatment option.

Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines.

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, was designed to generate 5-fluorouracil preferentially at the tumour site. This randomised, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Outpatients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer whose disease was unresponsive or resistant to anthracycline therapy were randomised to 3-week cycles of intermittent oral capecitabine (1255 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14, (22 patients)) or a reference arm of i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m(-2), (20 patients)). Two additional patients were initially randomised to continuous capecitabine 666 mg m(-2) twice daily, but this arm was closed following selection of the intermittent schedule for further development. Overall response rate was 36% (95% CI 17-59%) with capecitabine (including three complete responses) and 26% (95% CI 9-51%) with paclitaxel (no complete responses). Median time to disease progression was similar in the two treatment groups (3.0 months with capecitabine, 3.1 months with paclitaxel), as was overall survival (7.6 and 9.4 months, respectively). Paclitaxel was associated with more alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia and neutropenia, whereas typical capecitabine-related adverse events were diarrhoea, vomiting and hand-foot syndrome. Twenty-three per cent of capecitabine-treated patients and 16% of paclitaxel-treated patients achieved a > or =10% improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status. Oral capecitabine is active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer and has a favourable safety profile. Furthermore, capecitabine provides a convenient, patient-orientated therapy.

Current status of anti-angiogenic agents in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma

During the last decade we have assisted in the development of new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of ovarian cancer, based on the best knowledge of molecular biology. One of the most promising strategies under investigation is antiangiogenic therapy. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal humanised antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which has shown antitumour activity in ovarian cancer in preclinical models as well as in clinical trials, both in monotherapy and in combination with other therapies. Currently, ongoing phase III trials are testing bevacizumab as a front-line therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Bevacizumab has been generally well tolerated with mild frequent toxicities (proteinuria, hypertension and bleeding). However, the drug may result in other uncommon, but potentially life-threatening side effects, such as arterial thromboembolism, wound healing complications, and gastrointestinal perforation or fistulae, which should be considered when the drug is administered. Other new therapeutic antiangiogenic strategies that include small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibodies neutralising the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) and soluble VEGFR hybrids (VEGF Trap) are being investigated with promising early results (AU)

Targeted therapy of metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterised by a dysregulation of multiple pathways related to cell differentiation, cell cycle control, apoptosis, angiogenesis and development of metastasis. Acting against these pathways provides therapeutic targets for new targeted biologic therapies, which, in the future, might constitute a key for fighting cancer. The development of molecular technology in recent years has allowed a further comprehension of these mutations and dysregulated pathways leading to oncogenesis. New targeted biologic therapies will block essential functions of cancer cells and tumour stroma. A growing number of therapy options, alone or in combination with background treatments (chemotherapy, hormone therapy, radiotherapy), will allow oncologists a better adaptation of treatment to patients and disease characteristics. Examples of approved targeted agents in breast cancer include agents targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), such as trastuzumab, lapatinib and the anti-VEGF bevacizumab. In addition, there are other therapy classes under evaluation, including novel antiEGFR or antiHER2 therapies; agents fighting other tyrosine kinases, including the Src and the insulinlike growth factor receptor; agents interfering critically relevant pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors; and agents promoting apoptosis, such as PARP inhibitors (for particular breast cancer subtypes, such as basal-like, or breast cancer with BRCA mutations) and others. The better selectivity against malignant cells of these therapies, when compared to conventional chemotherapy, gives, a priori, at least two advantages to biologic treatments: fewer side effects and a more individualised treatment of cancer depending on the tumour's molecular characteristics. The ability to identify patients' subgroups and response predicting factors will be crucial in obtaining the greatest benefit with minimal toxicity levels. Unsolved questions remain, such as appropriate patient selection based on the expression of the therapeutic target in the tumour, the study of the efficacy of the drug in not so extensively pretreated populations and with a greater chance of response, the use of new pharmacodynamic models to help to define new response predicting factors for a specific new biologic therapy, the combined and rational use of different biologic therapies having different molecular targets and fighting the same target through a complementary mechanism of action that might improve clinical efficacy (AU)

No disponible

Spanish Society of Medical Oncology consensus on the use of erythropoietic stimulating agents in anaemic cancer patients

Treatment of anaemia is a very important aspect in the management of cancer patients. In order to carry out a consensus process about the use of erythropoietic stimulating agents (ESAs) in cancer patients, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) elaborated a working group which coordinated a panel of medical oncology specialists. This working group has reviewed the main issues about the use of ESAs. In addition a consensus meeting was held in Madrid on 25 April 2007. The following conclusions were made: Since ESA treatment increases the haemoglobin (Hb) level and decreases the red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements, ESAs should be used within the approved indications in patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment, beginning at a Hb level below 11 g/dl and maintaining it around 12 g/dl, with iron supplements if necessary. Neither increasing the ESA dose in nonresponders nor the use of ESAs in the treatment of chronic cancer-related anaemia is recommended (AU)

No disponible

Erythropoietin pharmacology

Anaemia is a frequent complication in cancer patients and may be multifactorial in origin. Treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is an alternative to red blood cell transfusion. The evidence from clinical trials has established that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia with a haemoglobin concentration below 10 g/dl benefit from epoetin therapy. The native glycoprotein hormone consists of 165 amino acids with three N-glycosylation and one O-glycosylation sites. Epoetin and darbepoetin bind to the EPO receptor to induce intracellular signalling by the same intracellular molecules as native EPO. There are some differences in the glycosylation pattern which lead to variations in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic studies have examined the use of rHuEPO administered intravenously and subcutaneously and there is accumulating evidence that the latter route has several advantages in cancer patients. After subcutaneous administration, the bioavailability of epoetin is about 20-30% and has a plasma half-life of >24 h. Darbepoetin has a longer half-life after subcutaneous administration of 48 h. The general recommendations are based on evidence from trials in which epoetin was administered 150 U/kg thrice weekly. The recommended initial dose for darbepoetin alpha is 2.25 mug/kg per week. The most serious adverse effects are hypertension, bleeding and increased risk of thrombotic complications. Caution is advised when used in patients who are at high risk for thromboembolic events. In the management of anaemic cancer patients, physicians should closely follow the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines (AU)

Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the appendix. A 52 years old male with acute appendicitis

El carcinoide de células globoides, también denominadoadenocarcinoide, carcinoma mucinoso, ycarcinoma de células de la cripta, es una rara neoplasiacon características específicas clínicas y patológicas.Revisamos el manejo del carcinoide decélulas globoides del apéndice aprovechando la presentaciónde un caso clínico ilustrativo

Goblet cell carcinoid, also variably known asadenocarcinoid, mucinous carcinoid, and crypt cellcarcinoma, is a rare neoplasm with distincthistological and clinical features. We review themanagement of goblet cell carcinoid of theappendix using an illustrative case report