RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: First aid measures in cases of epileptic seizures are crucial. Misconceptions about seizure first-aid measures are probably common. Most of the previous data focused on teachers and healthcare providers. The objective of this study was to assess the awareness of seizure first-aid measures and their associated factors in a community sample in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out using an online questionnaire between July 2020 and February 2021. Those who had never heard of epilepsy and healthcare workers were excluded. Overall and individual scores were calculated for first-aid measures during and after the seizures as well as calling the ambulance. RESULTS: A total of 1542 participants were included in the study. The overall awareness score of seizure first-aid measures was 57.3%. The awareness of the need to call the ambulance in special circumstances was the highest individual score (78.3%), followed by measures after the seizure (54.2%), and finally measures during the seizure (48.4%). For the latter, the awareness of injury prevention measures was the highest (74.9%), while the awareness of treatment options was the lowest (12.2%). Overall awareness score was significantly higher in older age (pâ¯=â¯0.015), female gender (pâ¯<â¯0.001), divorced status (pâ¯=â¯0.014), knowing someone with epilepsy (pâ¯<â¯0.001), attending a course or workshop about seizure first-aid (pâ¯<â¯0.001), watching a video on seizure first-aid on any platform (pâ¯<â¯0.001), and having basic life support training (pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The awareness of seizure first-aid measures is still inadequate among the public in Saudi Arabia. The current finding underscores the importance of simulation videos on social media and/or field-training campaigns to improve the public awareness of seizure first-aid measures.
Asunto(s)
Primeros Auxilios , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Convulsiones/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare neurovascular condition that has been observed in individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to explore the sex differences and characteristics of concurrent COVID-19 and CVST cases. A total of 212 CVST patients were included in the study. Women with CVST had a slightly higher mean age compared to men (47.359 years vs 46.08 years). Women were more likely to report symptoms such as fever (56.1%) and decreased sense of smell or taste (71.4%), while men more frequently experienced nausea or vomiting (55.6%), headache (62.9%), and seizures (72%). Notably, current smokers, who were predominantly men, had a higher occurrence of CVST. On the other hand, women had a higher likelihood of CVST risk factors such as oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use and autoimmune diseases. Treatment approaches also showed sex-based differences. Unfractionated heparin was administered more often to women with CVST (63.2%). The in-hospital mortality rate for CVST patients was 21.3%, with men having a significantly higher mortality rate than women (65.2% vs 34.8%, P = .027). Survival analysis revealed that factors such as smoking history, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, OCP use, COVID-19 symptoms, CVST symptoms, and the need for intubation significantly influenced survival outcomes. Understanding these sex differences in COVID-19-related CVST is crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective management, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of considering sex as a factor in the evaluation and treatment of individuals with COVID-19 and concurrent CVST.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Caracteres Sexuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during endovascular treatment (EVT) of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (rIA). METHODS: IONM and clinical data from 323 patients who underwent EVT for rIA from 2014-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Significant IONM changes and outcomes were evaluated based on visual review of data and clinical documentation. RESULTS: Of the 323 patients undergoing EVT, significant IONM changes were noted in 30 patients (9.29%) and 46 (14.24%) experienced postprocedural neurological deficits (PPND). 22 out of 30 (73.33%) patients who had significant IONM changes experienced PPND. Univariable analysis showed changes in somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and electroencephalogram (EEG) were associated with PPND (p-values: <0.001 and <0.001, retrospectively). Multivariable analysis showed that IONM changes were significantly associated with PPND (Odd ratio (OR) 20.18 (95%CI:7.40-55.03, p-value: <0.001)). Simultaneous changes in both IONM modalities had specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.1%-99.7%). While sensitivity when either modality had a change was 47.8% (95% CI: 33.9%-62.0%) to predict PPND. CONCLUSIONS: Significant IONM changes during EVT for rIA are associated with an increased risk of PPND. SIGNIFICANCE: IONM can be used confidently as a real time neurophysiological diagnostic guide for impending neurological deficits during EVT treatment of rIA.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto , Isquemia Encefálica , Electroencefalografía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales , Aneurisma Intracraneal , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Aneurisma Roto/cirugía , Aneurisma Roto/fisiopatología , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Aneurisma Intracraneal/fisiopatología , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/métodos , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales/fisiología , Anciano , Adulto , Electroencefalografía/métodosRESUMEN
Objectives: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder affecting more than 50 million human lives of all ages, its social, physical and psychological implications is of huge concern. The current study and as a continuation of epilepsy knowledge assessment projects conducted by our research team is aimed to assess the knowledge of healthcare workers regarding epilepsy first aid in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was carried out from 2020 to 2021. Results: During the study period, 272 healthcare workers were recruited; participants were males and females from different nationalities in various Saudi Arabian cities, possess diverse qualifications, and belong to several healthcare-related professions. The question, "Did you witness an epileptic seizure"? was answered as "Yes" by 42% of participants, and in response to the question "If you know that this patient struggles during seizure attacks," 58% of respondents stated that they would not call an ambulance. Moreover, the question "Put something in his/her mouth to prevent tongue biting" was incorrectly answered as "Yes" by 42% of respondents, and the question "Try to catch him/her and stop his/her movement" in order to control the attack was answered "Yes" by 21% of respondents. Furthermore, almost 90% of healthcare participants do not know how to use the Vagus Nerve Stimulation device. The mean knowledge score among participants was 23.7; sex, as well as type of higher qualification obtained, was found to be significantly associated with the score of knowledge. Conclusion: Knowledge toward epilepsy and epilepsy first aid among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia was found fragile. Further research is appreciated to support the current findings.
RESUMEN
Rheumatic diseases (RD) are chronic diseases that significantly affect the lives of patients. Assessing health outcomes through a patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) is essential for RD management. Moreover, these tend to be less favorable among individuals than among the rest of the population. This study aimed to compare PROMIS between RD patients and other patients. This cross sectional study was conducted in the year 2021. Information about patients with RD was obtained from the RD registry at King Saud University Medical City. Patients without RD were recruited from family medicine clinics. Patients were contacted electronically through WhatsApp© to complete the PROMIS surveys. We compared the individual PROMIS scores between the 2 groups using linear regression, adjusting for sex, nationality, marital status, education level, employment, family history of RD, income, and chronic comorbidities. There were 1024 individuals (512 with RD and 512 without RD). The most common RD was systemic lupus erythematosus (51.6%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (44.3%). Individuals with RD reported significantly higher PROMIS T-scores for pain [ß = 6.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.76, 7.71] and fatigue (ß = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.37, 4.38) compared to those without RD. Moreover, RD individuals reported lower physical functioning (ß = -5.4; 95% CI = -6.50, -4.24) and social interaction (ß = -4.5; 95% CI = -5.73, -3.20). Patients with RD in Saudi Arabia, particularly those with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, have significantly greater impairment in physical functioning and social interaction and report higher levels of fatigue and pain. Addressing and ameliorating these negative outcomes is necessary to improve quality of life.