Intravenous immunoglobulins, cyclosporine, and best supportive care in epidermal necrolysis: Diverse effects on systemic inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but potentially life-threatening cutaneous adverse reactions. There is still no consensus on adjuvant treatments, and little is known about their effects on systemic inflammation in SJS/TEN. Our aim was to characterize the systemic and cutaneous immune profiles of SJS/TEN patients and to investigate whether/how intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), cyclosporine A (CSA), and best supportive care only (BSCO) affected the systemic immune signature and clinical outcome (6 week-mortality, complications, hospitalization stay). METHODS: We included 16 patients with SJS/TEN, treated with high-dose IVIG (n = 8), CSA (n = 4) or BSCO (n = 4). Serial serum samples were obtained prior-, 5-7 days, and 21 days after treatment onset. Serum levels of inflammation-/immune response-associated proteins were measured by high-throughput proteomics assay (OLINK) and cytotoxic molecules by ELISA. RNA extracted from skin biopsies collected prior treatment was analyzed by Nanostring. RESULTS: Serum inflammatory profiles in SJS/TEN patients were notably characterized by massive upregulation of type 1 immune response and proinflammatory markers. Surprisingly, there was limited overlap between cutaneous and serum immune profiles. Serial serological measurements of immune response markers showed very diverse dynamics between the different treatment groups. IVIG-treated patients showed completely different dynamics and most significant proteomic changes in an early phase (Day 5-7). In all treatment groups, type 1-/inflammatory response markers were dampened at day 21. Clinically, there were no outcome differences. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that BSCO, CSA, and IVIG have very diverse biological effects on the systemic inflammatory response in SJS/TEN, which may not correlate with clinical outcome differences.

A Three months Electrodiagnostic Follow-Up of Patients Suspected of having Ulnar Nerve Involvement at Elbow Level with Normal Conventional Electrodiagnostic Study at First Evaluation.

Background: Compression of ulnar nerve at the elbow is the second most common peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremity. Objective: Due to the lack of the gold diagnostic standard for ulnar nerve involvement at elbow level (UNE) and the lack of sufficient study in this field, we decided to evaluate patients with symptoms of this disease who have normal conventional electrodiagnostic study (EDX) in first evaluation. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 18 persons were selected from patients who were referred to the clinic of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. If conventional EDX was normal, compound nerve action potential (CNAP) test (peak latency and amplitude) was carried out. Patients with normal conventional EDX but abnormal ulnar CNAP included to our study. After 3 months, if they had not been treated for ulnar neuropathy, they were reexamined by conventional EDX plus ulnar CNAP measurement. Results: In total, 18 patients (11 females, 7 males) aged 28-58 years old (mean = 40.11) were analyzed in this study. After 3 months, 14 patients (77.8%) demonstrated parameter changes consistent with UNE in conventional EDX. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, ulnar CNAP has diagnostic value in patients with symptoms of UNE who have normal routine EDX. Therefore, ulnar CNAP should be taken into account for early diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy when routine electrodiagnostic tests are normal.

Clinical Presentation and Prognostic Features in Patients with Immunotherapy-Induced Vitiligo-like Depigmentation: A Monocentric Prospective Observational Study.

Vitiligo-like depigmentation (VLD) is an immune-related adverse event (irAE) of checkpoint-inhibitor (CPI) treatment, which has previously been associated with a favourable outcome. The aim of this study was to explore clinical, biological and prognostic features of melanoma patients with VLD under CPI-treatment and to explore whether they exhibit a characteristic immune response profile in peripheral blood. Melanoma patients developing VLD under CPI were included in a prospective observational single-center cohort study. We collected and analysed clinical parameters, photographs and serum from 28 VLD patients. They received pembrolizumab (36%), nivolumab (11%), ipilimumab/nivolumab (32%) or clinical trial medications (21%). We performed a high-throughput proteomics assay (Olink), in which we identified a distinct proteomic signature in VLD patients in comparison to non-VLD CPI patients. Our clinical assessments revealed that VLD lesions had a predominantly symmetrical distribution pattern, with mostly smaller "freckle-like" macules and a preferential distribution in UV-exposed areas. Patients with previous targeted therapy showed a significantly longer time lapse between CPI initiation and VLD onset compared to non-pre-treated patients (12.5 vs. 6.25 months). Therapy responders exhibited a distinct proteomic profile when compared with non-responders in VLD such as upregulation of EDAR and downregulation of LAG3. ITGA11 was elevated in the VLD-group when compared to non-VLD-CPI-treated melanoma patients. Our findings demonstrate that on a proteomic level, VLD is characterized by a distinct immune signature when compared to CPI-treated patients without VLD and that therapy responsiveness is reflected by a characteristic immune profile. The pathomechanisms underlying these findings and how they could relate to the antitumoral response in melanoma remain to be elucidated.