Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Asunto principal
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 15(5): e38507, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37284386

RESUMEN

Angiosarcoma is a rare soft tissue sarcoma originating from endothelial cells. It can occur anywhere when there is a blood vessel or lymphatic channel, making highly perfused cutaneous sites their usual location, though they can also develop within visceral structures. Pulmonary angiosarcoma is usually caused by metastasis from other primary sites. The clinical course of pulmonary angiosarcoma is very aggressive, and the prognosis is poor. We present a case of a 55-year-old man who presented to the hospital with progressive exertional dyspnea and right-sided pleuritic chest pain for the past few days. He was found to have recurrent anemia and acute kidney injury. His hospital course was complicated by the development of hypoxia and hemoptysis. Computed tomography of the chest without contrast revealed bilateral nodular, ground-glass opacities compatible with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Further investigation with a lung biopsy revealed epithelioid angiosarcoma with extensive microvascular tumor emboli and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (Aspergillus fumigatus) with patchy necrotizing pneumonia. He later developed acute hypoxic respiratory failure and worsening kidney failure, so he was transferred to the intensive care unit. Upon discussing with the family, the patient was put on comfort measures, and he passed away the following day. We present a rare presentation of concurrence of pulmonary angiosarcoma and invasive aspergillosis. Upon searching the literature, our case is one of the first to report such concurrence. Because of its rarity, the non-specific clinical presentation makes the diagnosis challenging.

2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 13: 780872, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35721716

RESUMEN

Background: Obesity affects the course of critical illnesses. We aimed to estimate the association of obesity with the severity and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted from the inception of the COVID-19 pandemic through to 13 October 2021, on databases including Medline (PubMed), Embase, Science Web, and Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Registry. Preprint servers such as BioRxiv, MedRxiv, ChemRxiv, and SSRN were also scanned. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Full-length articles focusing on the association of obesity and outcome in COVID-19 patients were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used for study selection and data extraction. Our Population of interest were COVID-19 positive patients, obesity is our Intervention/Exposure point, Comparators are Non-obese vs obese patients The chief outcome of the study was the severity of the confirmed COVID-19 positive hospitalized patients in terms of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation with obesity. All-cause mortality in COVID-19 positive hospitalized patients with obesity was the secondary outcome of the study. Results: In total, 3,140,413 patients from 167 studies were included in the study. Obesity was associated with an increased risk of severe disease (RR=1.52, 95% CI 1.41-1.63, p<0.001, I2 = 97%). Similarly, high mortality was observed in obese patients (RR=1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, p=0.006, I2 = 97%). In multivariate meta-regression on severity, the covariate of the female gender, pulmonary disease, diabetes, older age, cardiovascular diseases, and hypertension was found to be significant and explained R2 = 40% of the between-study heterogeneity for severity. The aforementioned covariates were found to be significant for mortality as well, and these covariates collectively explained R2 = 50% of the between-study variability for mortality. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that obesity is significantly associated with increased severity and higher mortality among COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the inclusion of obesity or its surrogate body mass index in prognostic scores and improvement of guidelines for patient care management is recommended.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Pandemias , Respiración Artificial
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 703661, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35083229

RESUMEN

Purpose: The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess association of mortality in COVID-19 patients on Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs). A secondary objective is to assess associations with higher severity of the disease in COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: We searched multiple COVID-19 databases (WHO, CDC, LIT-COVID) for longitudinal studies globally reporting mortality and severity published before January 18th, 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using 53 studies for mortality outcome and 43 for the severity outcome. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were generated to describe overall effect size using random effect models. To account for between study results variations, multivariate meta-regression was performed with preselected covariates using maximum likelihood method for both the mortality and severity models. Result: Our findings showed that the use of ACEIs/ARBs did not significantly influence either mortality (OR = 1.16 95% CI 0.94-1.44, p = 0.15, I 2 = 93.2%) or severity (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.94-1.48, p = 0.15, I 2 = 91.1%) in comparison to not being on ACEIs/ARBs in COVID-19 positive patients. Multivariate meta-regression for the mortality model demonstrated that 36% of between study variations could be explained by differences in age, gender, and proportion of heart diseases in the study samples. Multivariate meta-regression for the severity model demonstrated that 8% of between study variations could be explained by differences in age, proportion of diabetes, heart disease and study country in the study samples. Conclusion: We found no association of mortality or severity in COVID-19 patients taking ACEIs/ARBs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA